HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: hard option for NFS mounts versus Oracle RDBMS
Operating System - HP-UX
1834264
Members
77308
Online
110066
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-28-2008 12:23 PM
11-28-2008 12:23 PM
hard option for NFS mounts versus Oracle RDBMS
Hello forum people!
We have this Oracle instance that does not want to write its files on a NFS mounter filesystem.
The instance complains thusly :
ORA-27054: NFS file system where the file is created or resides is not mounted with correct options.
We dug up that oracle scans the filesystems with a "mount" command and expects some specific options to be set in order to consider the filesystem worthy of its files.
Amongst the requisites is the "hard" mount option.
We are using 11.31 and I understand "hard" is an implicit default of NFSv3 mounts. Problem is a plain "mount", as used by oracle, does not show the filesystem as hard mounted. nfsstat does confirm that all is well. Specifying hard at the mount command or not changes nothing. Explicitely specifying soft at the mount command produces a mount output featuring the soft option. Please see the following output.
# mount | grep oras
/orashare on 10.1.3.1:/oracle_RAC/racdev nointr,noac,forcedirectio,timeo=300,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,NFSv3,dev=1000009 on Fri Nov 28 14:50:55 2008
# nfsstat -m
/orashare from 10.1.3.1:/oracle_RAC/racdev
Flags: vers=3,proto=tcp,sec=sys,hard,nointr,noac,forcedirectio,link,symlink,acl,devs,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,retrans=5,timeo=300
Attr cache: acregmin=3,acregmax=60,acdirmin=30,acdirmax=60
Background :
Rx3600 running 11.31, setp 2008 patch level
Using NFSv3
NFS server is an EMC Celerra NAS box
Questions :
Is there a way to coax the plain "mount" command into displaying the hard option as set ?
If the plain mount command shows a soft mount explicitely, should it now also show a hard mount in the same explicit manner ?
Are there other ways to prod Oracle into seeing the light ?
All suggestions are welcome.
We have this Oracle instance that does not want to write its files on a NFS mounter filesystem.
The instance complains thusly :
ORA-27054: NFS file system where the file is created or resides is not mounted with correct options.
We dug up that oracle scans the filesystems with a "mount" command and expects some specific options to be set in order to consider the filesystem worthy of its files.
Amongst the requisites is the "hard" mount option.
We are using 11.31 and I understand "hard" is an implicit default of NFSv3 mounts. Problem is a plain "mount", as used by oracle, does not show the filesystem as hard mounted. nfsstat does confirm that all is well. Specifying hard at the mount command or not changes nothing. Explicitely specifying soft at the mount command produces a mount output featuring the soft option. Please see the following output.
# mount | grep oras
/orashare on 10.1.3.1:/oracle_RAC/racdev nointr,noac,forcedirectio,timeo=300,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,NFSv3,dev=1000009 on Fri Nov 28 14:50:55 2008
# nfsstat -m
/orashare from 10.1.3.1:/oracle_RAC/racdev
Flags: vers=3,proto=tcp,sec=sys,hard,nointr,noac,forcedirectio,link,symlink,acl,devs,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,retrans=5,timeo=300
Attr cache: acregmin=3,acregmax=60,acdirmin=30,acdirmax=60
Background :
Rx3600 running 11.31, setp 2008 patch level
Using NFSv3
NFS server is an EMC Celerra NAS box
Questions :
Is there a way to coax the plain "mount" command into displaying the hard option as set ?
If the plain mount command shows a soft mount explicitely, should it now also show a hard mount in the same explicit manner ?
Are there other ways to prod Oracle into seeing the light ?
All suggestions are welcome.
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-28-2008 12:26 PM
11-28-2008 12:26 PM
Re: hard option for NFS mounts versus Oracle RDBMS
Ok scratch that, the option Oracle was looking for was "forcedirectio", hard not being displayed in the mount command's output had nothing to do with it.
wOOt !
wOOt !
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP