- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- heavier memory use on 11.23 rp4440 vs 11.0 v2500
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-23-2006 02:28 AM
03-23-2006 02:28 AM
Anybody know of new, unneeded processes in 11.23 that I can turn off?
system memory on v2500: 380 megs.
system memory on rp4440: 2.6 GIGS
There is a vxsvc job that's using 46meg. I'm not using VXVM but maybe that's what this is?
I'm guessing here, but the disks and filesystems are a lot larger on the new box (72gig disk vs 8gig disk). The extent size is 16megs vs 4megs. Perhaps there is a document that shows how kernel parameters and the layout of volume groups affects kernel memory?
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-23-2006 02:33 AM
03-23-2006 02:33 AM
Re: heavier memory use on 11.23 rp4440 vs 11.0 v2500
As far as kernel memory and LVM goes, the immediate parameter that comes to my mind is that about 4-8KB of kernel memory is used for every increment in 'maxvgs'.
Regards!
...JRF...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-23-2006 02:43 AM
03-23-2006 02:43 AM
Re: heavier memory use on 11.23 rp4440 vs 11.0 v2500
Anyway this idea about volume groups is just a guess. Perhaps it's just that the newer boxes use this much because it's a "more modern"?
I attached the kernel parameters into one text file.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-23-2006 03:02 AM
03-23-2006 03:02 AM
Re: heavier memory use on 11.23 rp4440 vs 11.0 v2500
What I have found is that there are more unnecessary processes started by default e.g.
samba/cifs, httpd.
Plus others which have been re-engineered, like the scrdaemon.
Then you need to be aware of Java...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-27-2006 07:34 AM
03-27-2006 07:34 AM
Re: heavier memory use on 11.23 rp4440 vs 11.0 v2500
Kernel variable vx_ninode was set to a default of 0. This needed to change. I changed it to 12000 because 11
Supposedly "sar -v" shows that vx_inode should be above the number of open vx inodes. It looks like it's 900.
And the adb command showed vx_inode was was set to somewhere over 300,000.
300,000 is a lot bigger than 900.
After I changed vx_inode (to 12,000), I got over a GIG of memory back.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-27-2006 07:57 AM
03-27-2006 07:57 AM
SolutionThat parameter you found pretty much lets the system change it whenever it feels it needs to. This is also a problem with 11 vi btw and its very expenseive in terms of CPU and memory to change it.
Best to set it to a number your system can live with. Its all part of the tuning process.
The OS does more than 11.00 and its reasonable to expect it to use and need a little more memory.
SEP
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com