- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- how to reduce TIME_WAIT
Operating System - HP-UX
1819870
Members
2705
Online
109607
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-08-2010 06:03 PM
тАО01-08-2010 06:03 PM
how to reduce TIME_WAIT
weblogic 8.1.6 installed on hpux 11.31
there are about 15000 tcp TIME_WAIT when loadrunner test. how can i reduce TIME_WAIT?
there are about 15000 tcp TIME_WAIT when loadrunner test. how can i reduce TIME_WAIT?
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-08-2010 11:38 PM
тАО01-08-2010 11:38 PM
Re: how to reduce TIME_WAIT
Check below thread
you can reduce the TCP_TIME_WAIT using ndd command
http://forums11.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=1031869
you can reduce the TCP_TIME_WAIT using ndd command
http://forums11.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=1031869
Problems are common to all, but attitude makes the difference
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-09-2010 02:12 PM
тАО01-09-2010 02:12 PM
Re: how to reduce TIME_WAIT
Rick Jones from HP says HP-UX can handle millions of connections in TIME_WAIT state without significant performance impact and using very little memory to do that.
So do you have a real issue because of 15 000 TIME_WAITs, or are you asking just because the long netstat listing "looks bad"?
ftp://ftp.cup.hp.com/dist/networking/briefs/annotated_ndd.txt
http://forums.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=1398855
MK
So do you have a real issue because of 15 000 TIME_WAITs, or are you asking just because the long netstat listing "looks bad"?
ftp://ftp.cup.hp.com/dist/networking/briefs/annotated_ndd.txt
http://forums.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=1398855
MK
MK
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-11-2010 10:48 AM
тАО01-11-2010 10:48 AM
Re: how to reduce TIME_WAIT
Let me guess - loadrunning is starting to be unable to establish more connections? At the risk of repeating what is in the URLs, TIME_WAIT is there for a purpose - to protect new connections with the same "name" from old, delayed segments from previous connections by that name.
Given that the default anonymous port space in HP-UX is ~16K (49152 to 65535) and the statement of "about 15000" I would guess that whatever loadrunner is being asked to do involves connecting to a fixed remote IP and port number from the one local IP address and the anonymous port range.
Rather than shrink TIME_WAIT it would be "best" to do more work per TCP connection.
If that is not possible, then it would be "better" to get the loadrunner code to start making explicit local port number bindings from the "full" range of say 5000 to 65535. If that is not possible, then it would be "good" increase the size of the anonymous port space by tweaking tcp_smallest_anon_port.
Somewhere in all that would also be getting the load runner code to make use of more than one local IP address. Particularly if you are trying to simulate lots of remote clients connecting to the weblogic service provided by the system...
The whole idea is to increase the number of available/utilized "names" for TCP connections by increasing the number of local port numbers and/or IP addresses being used.
Given that the default anonymous port space in HP-UX is ~16K (49152 to 65535) and the statement of "about 15000" I would guess that whatever loadrunner is being asked to do involves connecting to a fixed remote IP and port number from the one local IP address and the anonymous port range.
Rather than shrink TIME_WAIT it would be "best" to do more work per TCP connection.
If that is not possible, then it would be "better" to get the loadrunner code to start making explicit local port number bindings from the "full" range of say 5000 to 65535. If that is not possible, then it would be "good" increase the size of the anonymous port space by tweaking tcp_smallest_anon_port.
Somewhere in all that would also be getting the load runner code to make use of more than one local IP address. Particularly if you are trying to simulate lots of remote clients connecting to the weblogic service provided by the system...
The whole idea is to increase the number of available/utilized "names" for TCP connections by increasing the number of local port numbers and/or IP addresses being used.
there is no rest for the wicked yet the virtuous have no pillows
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Learn About
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP