- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- I need of Best of you Read performance on the disk
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-05-2006 10:47 PM
03-05-2006 10:47 PM
I have this scenario :
Cluster Siebel
2 rp7420 in cluster
Ram 19 Gb
8 CPU da 1000
Oracle 8.1.7 in archive mode
storage DMX 3000 in fibra in RAID 3+1
Power Path
The problem is the read perfomance is very slowly and this configuration when was on solaris was the much fastest one ....
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-05-2006 11:11 PM
03-05-2006 11:11 PM
Re: I need of Best of you Read performance on the disk
Please post the following outputs:
#sar -b 3 33
#sar -v 3 33
And since this is Oracle:
select (bbc.total_waits*100/(cg.value+dbg.value)) "Buff busy ratio"
from v$system_event bbc,
v$sysstat cg, v$sysstat dbg
where bbc.event='buffer busy waits'
and cg.name ='consistent gets'
and dbg.name='db block gets';
select round(100 * sum(getmisses) / sum(gets), 2) "Misses Pct (%)"
from v$rowcache
having sum(gets) > 1000;
select (1-(sum(getmisses)/sum(gets))) * 100 "Hit Ratio"
from v$rowcache;
select round(((1-(sum(decode(name, 'physical reads', value,0)) /
(sum(decode(name,'db block gets', value,0))+
(sum(decode(name, 'consistent gets', value, 0))))))*100),2)
|| '%' "Buffer Cache Hit Ratio (%)"
from v$sysstat;
select round(100 * sum(reloads) / sum(pins), 2) "Reloads Pct (%)"
from v$librarycache
having sum(pins) > 1000;
select pool, name, bytes/1024/1024 "Free Size in MB"
from v$sgastat
where name='free memory';
Best Regards,
Eric Antunes
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-05-2006 11:17 PM
03-05-2006 11:17 PM
Re: I need of Best of you Read performance on the disk
Raid 3+1 ??
Thats a new one.
Perhaps Raid 5 will be fasted for Raid because it has the most copies of all data around.
You might want to use a performance utility to collect some information and find the bottleneck.
http://www.hpux.ws/system.perf.sh
SEP
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-06-2006 12:45 AM
03-06-2006 12:45 AM
Re: I need of Best of you Read performance on the disk
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-06-2006 12:57 AM
03-06-2006 12:57 AM
Re: I need of Best of you Read performance on the disk
Can you as well post: "sar -d 5 5" and vmstat 5 5 -- IF you are still having issues?
Also, how did you configure your Oracle storage? Filesystems or RAW? Also, did you stipe the DMX LUNs and what Volume Manager did you use?
Favourite Toy:
AMD Athlon II X6 1090T 6-core, 16GB RAM, 12TB ZFS RAIDZ-2 Storage. Linux Centos 5.6 running KVM Hypervisor. Virtual Machines: Ubuntu, Mint, Solaris 10, Windows 7 Professional, Windows XP Pro, Windows Server 2008R2, DOS 6.22, OpenFiler
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-06-2006 01:16 AM
03-06-2006 01:16 AM
Re: I need of Best of you Read performance on the disk
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-06-2006 01:41 AM
03-06-2006 01:41 AM
Re: I need of Best of you Read performance on the disk
Can you also send "vgdisplay -v vgoradata" please to confirm if you've striping or not and if your LUN used for oraarch is on its own LUN? Also, can you check what your kernel max queue depth is and what is recommended for a DMX? I recall for EMCs -- it should be no less than 16.
kmtune|egrep "dbc|qdepth"
The above command will show caching and qdepth settings you have.
Solutions I can recommend this early:
1. MIgrate your oracle storage to striped for the Oracle datafiles.
2. Provide a non-striped/RAID10 LUN(s) for your oraarch storage so it is separate from your oracle datafile stripes.
Favourite Toy:
AMD Athlon II X6 1090T 6-core, 16GB RAM, 12TB ZFS RAIDZ-2 Storage. Linux Centos 5.6 running KVM Hypervisor. Virtual Machines: Ubuntu, Mint, Solaris 10, Windows 7 Professional, Windows XP Pro, Windows Server 2008R2, DOS 6.22, OpenFiler
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-06-2006 02:03 AM
03-06-2006 02:03 AM
Re: I need of Best of you Read performance on the disk
From your stats, I recommend:
Increase dbc_max_pct to 10 because 62% is a very bad buffer cache ratio.
Decrease ninode to 2048 since you are not using those 392946.
Your Oracle stats seems ok...
Best Regards,
Eric Antunes
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-06-2006 02:14 AM
03-06-2006 02:14 AM
Re: I need of Best of you Read performance on the disk
If you have any question about how to do this don't hesitate...
Best Regards,
Eric Antunes
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-06-2006 03:14 AM
03-06-2006 03:14 AM
Re: I need of Best of you Read performance on the disk
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-06-2006 03:14 AM
03-06-2006 03:14 AM
Re: I need of Best of you Read performance on the disk
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-06-2006 03:31 AM
03-06-2006 03:31 AM
Re: I need of Best of you Read performance on the disk
This early though, I can suggest a re-org of your storage:
1. stripe lvora 4 or 8 - way accross your DMX RAID3+1 LUNs.
2. For your oraarch volume.. leave it as a simple lvol (non-stripe) but better if you can get it to a RAID10 LUN instead of a RAID3+1 LUN.
3. If you do not have directIO enabled (,mincache=direct,convosync=direct) in your oradata mount .. please mount it using directio...
HTH.
Favourite Toy:
AMD Athlon II X6 1090T 6-core, 16GB RAM, 12TB ZFS RAIDZ-2 Storage. Linux Centos 5.6 running KVM Hypervisor. Virtual Machines: Ubuntu, Mint, Solaris 10, Windows 7 Professional, Windows XP Pro, Windows Server 2008R2, DOS 6.22, OpenFiler
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-06-2006 03:47 AM
03-06-2006 03:47 AM
Re: I need of Best of you Read performance on the disk
mount -p
/dev/vg00/lvol3 / vxfs ioerror=nodisable,log,dev=40000003 0 1
/dev/vg00/lvol1 /stand hfs defaults,dev=40000001 0 0
/dev/vg00/lvol8 /var vxfs ioerror=mwdisable,delaylog,dev=40000008 0 0
/dev/vg00/lvol7 /usr vxfs ioerror=mwdisable,delaylog,dev=40000007 0 0
/dev/vg00/lvol6 /tmp vxfs ioerror=mwdisable,delaylog,dev=40000006 0 0
/dev/vg00/lvoraeng /software vxfs ioerror=mwdisable,delaylog,dev=40000009 0 0
/dev/vg00/lvol5 /opt vxfs ioerror=mwdisable,delaylog,dev=40000005 0 0
/dev/vg00/lvol4 /home vxfs ioerror=mwdisable,delaylog,dev=40000004 0 0
-hosts /net autofs ignore,indirect,nosuid,soft,nobrowse,dev=5f000000 0 0
/dev/vgoradata/lvoraarc /archive vxfs ioerror=mwdisable,delaylog,dev=40010001 0 0
/dev/vgoradata/lvorabck /backup vxfs ioerror=mwdisable,delaylog,dev=40010002 0 0
/dev/vgoradata/lvoradata /data vxfs ioerror=mwdisable,delaylog,dev=40010003 0 0
/dev/vgoradata/lvcdw /spare vxfs ioerror=mwdisable,delaylog,dev=40010004 0 0
what you want to say with stripe lvora 4 or 8 - way accross your DMX RAID3+1 LUNs.
And do you know kernel parameter for dmx 3000
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-06-2006 03:58 AM
03-06-2006 03:58 AM
SolutionAs I suspected.. you do not have the Oracle best opractive on Filesystems of having enabled DirectIO.
Please change your fstab entry for oradata so you have directIO:
/dev/vx/dsk/vgoradata/lvoradata /data vxfs rw,suid,largefiles,convosync=d
irect,mincache=direct,datainlog 0 2
Also, I would strongly urge you to recreate your lvoradata lvol so it is a stripe accross your DMX LUNs:
lvcreate -L 122880 -i 4 -I 64 -n lvoradata /dev/vgoradata /dev/dsk/c10t9d3... c10t9dd6
Also make oraarch on its own PV.
Favourite Toy:
AMD Athlon II X6 1090T 6-core, 16GB RAM, 12TB ZFS RAIDZ-2 Storage. Linux Centos 5.6 running KVM Hypervisor. Virtual Machines: Ubuntu, Mint, Solaris 10, Windows 7 Professional, Windows XP Pro, Windows Server 2008R2, DOS 6.22, OpenFiler
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-07-2006 02:33 AM
03-07-2006 02:33 AM
Re: I need of Best of you Read performance on the disk
you aren't Caparroso ....
you are CAPA GROSSO that in Italian it wants to say you are the Best ....
:-)