- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Ignite and name resolution
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-01-2002 06:48 AM
тАО05-01-2002 06:48 AM
Ignite and name resolution
11i system with Ignite B.3.4.115 installed: My Ignite server cannot seem to resolve a hostname (hostname on its own or the FQDN) when I go to add new client for recovery from the IUX GUI, unless the hostname is put in my /etc/hosts, despite DNS being enabled and the hostname being resolvable on the command line.
My resolv.conf is configured correctly and my nsswitch.conf is currently set to :
hosts files dns nisplus
I've also got my .rhosts files configured on the two machines with the normal hostname not the FQDN.
Any help folks?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-01-2002 06:59 AM
тАО05-01-2002 06:59 AM
Re: Ignite and name resolution
hosts: files [NOTFOUND=continue] dns [NOTFOUND=continue] nisplus
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-01-2002 07:02 AM
тАО05-01-2002 07:02 AM
Re: Ignite and name resolution
Look in /etc/nsswitch.hp_defaults
This will give you what the default hosts: entry should looks like. I usualy dont change this unless im doing something special.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-01-2002 07:11 AM
тАО05-01-2002 07:11 AM
Re: Ignite and name resolution
hosts files dns nisplus
So, question is - will resolutions continue to the next source if the [NOTFOUND=continue] is not explicitly declared in the switch?
Note if I do a nslookup on the command line for the host in question, it will resolve the hostname if its in /etc/hosts, but it will proceed onto DNS if it isn't found (despite the [NOTFOUND=continue] being missing from nsswitch.conf).
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-01-2002 07:22 AM
тАО05-01-2002 07:22 AM
Re: Ignite and name resolution
It mentions that applications linked with libc.1 will not exhibit the same behaviour (as apps that are not) unless a criterion is specified between the sources. So it looks like I have to be specific.
This is of course if Ignite is linked with libc.1 - how would I find out?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-01-2002 07:27 AM
тАО05-01-2002 07:27 AM
Re: Ignite and name resolution
In answer to your last question, no it won't. From the man 4 switch page:
"...If no criteria is specified between two sources, then these default
actions are assigned to the statuses:
SUCCESS= return
NOTFOUND= return..."
It has been my experience that 9 times out of 10 when an application vendor requires a system parameter or config file to be setup a certain way and that way is non-standard or incomplete, that it is either an oversight or an outright error on the part of the app vendor. I'd definitely push-back on this if I were you, and point out to the vendor the default behavior above and ask them to explain just why they need the nsswitch file they way the say they do instead of what you need to do your job properly.
HTH
mark
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-01-2002 07:37 AM
тАО05-01-2002 07:37 AM
Re: Ignite and name resolution
"The default criteria are to continue on anything except SUCCESS; in other words, [SUCCESS=return NOTFOUND=continue UNAVAIL=continue TRYAGAIN=continue."
This would seem to contradict what you had?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-01-2002 07:41 AM
тАО05-01-2002 07:41 AM
Re: Ignite and name resolution
For the libc questions, have you tried running "strings /opt/ignite/bin/ignite |grep libc"?
mark
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-01-2002 07:55 AM
тАО05-01-2002 07:55 AM
Re: Ignite and name resolution
I've just tried changing the switch to:
hosts files [NOTFOUND=continue] dns nisplus
...and after restarting my Ignite session, my hostname is now resolvable (with it present in DNS and not in the local hosts).