- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: inode table warnings
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-04-2009 03:17 PM
08-04-2009 03:17 PM
we run a program sarcheck that analyzes sar stats.
Started appearing on HP-UX B.11.23
Is this anything to worry about ?
It is showing following warning about inode table
WARNING: A possible problem was seen in reading the size of the inode
table/cache. The min/max size as seen by the freemem utility was
4880/4880 and the min/max size as seen by the sar utility was
345932/345932. The inode cache data from the sar and freemem utilities
was inconsistent so no recommendations have been made. The following
analysis of the inode cache is based on the sar -v statistics and may
not be reliable.
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-04-2009 05:34 PM
08-04-2009 05:34 PM
Re: inode table warnings
Bill Hassell, sysadmin
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-05-2009 03:59 AM
08-05-2009 03:59 AM
Re: inode table warnings
To add to Bill's comments, 'ninode' is applicable only to HFS filesystems, not VxFS ones. Hence the kernel value of 'ninode' can be set quite low (e.g. to a value of 400 if '/stand' is your only HFS filesystem).
Regards!
...JRF...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-05-2009 12:46 PM
08-05-2009 12:46 PM
Re: inode table warnings
The kernal parameter is set as follows
ninode 4880 Default
so where does sar get it value from ?
345932/345932.
been hunting round but cant find it . Thought would be in /stand somewhere ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-05-2009 01:50 PM
08-05-2009 01:50 PM
Re: inode table warnings
if vx_ninode is set to 0 then it is calculated at boot based on amount of RAM. ( this is a good parameter to tune if you are tight on memory )
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-12-2009 03:41 PM
08-12-2009 03:41 PM
Re: inode table warnings
for Tims comment please.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-12-2009 04:03 PM
08-12-2009 04:03 PM
SolutionThere is a discussion of 'vx_ninode' in:
http://www.docs.hp.com/en/7779/commonMisconfig.pdf
Regards!
...JRF...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-29-2009 04:19 PM
09-29-2009 04:19 PM