- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: io performance: Oracle Archiver file allocatio...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-05-2004 12:14 AM
02-05-2004 12:14 AM
io performance: Oracle Archiver file allocation
Hello all ..
Being a Tru64 knowledgeable, I have a question on :
HOW does HP--UX allocate file space. ?
On a datawarehouse machine , migrating from wildfire (Tru64 ) to Superdome (HP-UX) we see a lot of fluctuation in io performance towards the SAN.
Every 2 to 3 minutes, corresponding to archive file beeing extended by oracle, there is a heavy io load.
The oracle installation extends with one Gbyte at the time.
On tru64 this was never a problem, it seemed like it extended on the fly.
DOES HP-UX do some checking/writing of zeroes, that could cause this io burst at every extension of the archive file ??
IF so, WHAT could be the recommandation to avoid this problem. ?
(oracle , kernel or filesys params)
Best regards
Martin Roende Andersen, denmark
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-05-2004 01:08 AM
02-05-2004 01:08 AM
Re: io performance: Oracle Archiver file allocation
do I get you right, every 2-3 minutes a new archive log with 1gb?
Michael
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-05-2004 04:33 AM
02-05-2004 04:33 AM
Re: io performance: Oracle Archiver file allocation
... or do you mean autoextend of a datafile ? Check your autoallocation clause!
Volker
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-07-2004 01:59 AM
02-07-2004 01:59 AM
Re: io performance: Oracle Archiver file allocation
Yes, every 2 to 3 minutes the archive log is extended, due to the amount of data put into the database.
This is a datawarehouse machine.
4 paths into the EVA SAN , and 16-20 CPU's on a superdome to write the data.
regards Martin
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-07-2004 09:35 AM
02-07-2004 09:35 AM
Re: io performance: Oracle Archiver file allocation
still wondering. Let me resume:
You have redologs size 1gb.
every 2-3 min you get a switch log and the archiver creates an archivelog of 1gb?
Is this correct? The term extend in the context on archive logging confused me.
2-3 min between log switches is to little. Each time the db has to make a checkpoint, causing a lot of I/O.
can you post show parameter?
Michael
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-08-2004 09:29 AM
02-08-2004 09:29 AM
Re: io performance: Oracle Archiver file allocation
regards Martin.
I will clarify
Sorry, yes, log switching..
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-08-2004 09:52 PM
02-08-2004 09:52 PM
Re: io performance: Oracle Archiver file allocation
as attachment ,,,
regards Martin
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-10-2004 08:23 AM
03-10-2004 08:23 AM
Re: io performance: Oracle Archiver file allocation
( btw... cursor_space_for_time = FALSE
Looks like you have enough memory, switch to true? )
> fast_start_mttr_target integer 300
That setting normally makes Oracle do 'softw checkpoints' unless LOG_CHECKPOINT_INTERVAL is set low which is it not or log_checkpoint_timeout is set low. That last one is default at 1800 second = 1/2 hour.
You have log_checkpoints_to_alert set to true (as IMHO you should), so maybe investigate the alert log at 'funny times' to see if you can correlate it with checkpoints?
How big are the redo log? Are they filling, and thus forcing checkpoints, too quickly?
Judging by your inputs sofar it looks like your redo file sizes should be in the 2 - 5GB space. How many mb/sec to the redo drives?
Your log_buffer is set to 65536000 (65M).
That's impressive and probably overkill, but I don't know whether it would hurt.
The larger TPC benchmarks use smaller numbers. I'd suggest trying 4 - 10 MB but have not strong argument for that.
You have timed_statistics = true. So you are burning CPU to get good insight numbers, are you using those numbers? Are statspacks being generated and analyzed? Share a few top sections here? (Like the first page with overview + top wait and the redo/checkpoint counters?
http://tahiti.oracle.com/pls/db901/db901.drilldown?word=fast_start_mttr_target&book=a90190
btw 2... >> mts_dispatchers =(PROTOCOL=TCP) (SERVICE=DWH01P
Are you really using mts? Is it worth it / required by the usage or perhaps a carried over 'tradition'. Give it a shot without?
hope this helps some,
Hein.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-10-2004 09:25 AM
03-10-2004 09:25 AM
Re: io performance: Oracle Archiver file allocation
I still have to ask. How often do you get a log switch?
Michael
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-16-2004 07:51 PM
03-16-2004 07:51 PM
Re: io performance: Oracle Archiver file allocation
I forward this to the DBA at the site , and try to get the answers.
Michael: Same thing , I ask the DBA of how often it log switches, I recall they use the 1800 as standard, but maybe not on this system.
In the mean time, Internal HP communication within the Multivendor Customer Service Engineering, (You might know CV from DK part of MCSE) has found that there is an piece of code in HPUX disk driver that causes DOUBLE work to be done on the archiver disk.
So that path to 11i is awaited.
I post you separately with details from CV
Regards Martin..
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-16-2004 09:19 PM
03-16-2004 09:19 PM
Re: io performance: Oracle Archiver file allocation
as soon one redolog is full, oracle creates an archive logfile, regardless of oracle settings. Have a look at the modification dates of the archives. That will give you a picture of how often this happens.
One log per 2-3min is too often because each switchlog requires a checkpoint and forces the database to empty all dirty blocks. If you have another switchlog before the last checkpoint is though, then you have checkpoint timeout and all this is not good for the performance.
So, what can you tell us about the fequency of the switchlogs?
greetings,
Michael
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-16-2004 11:52 PM
03-16-2004 11:52 PM
Re: io performance: Oracle Archiver file allocation
It is/was switching every 4 minutes.
Right now things have loosened up a bit , because they have changed blocksize towards the diskarea with archive and redologs, and they have seen improvements.
The recommendation from HP, be posted in a later entry ..
regards MArtin
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-17-2004 01:48 AM
03-17-2004 01:48 AM
Re: io performance: Oracle Archiver file allocation
This has made good improvement for the datawarehouse operation, and the customer is sofar satisfied.
Thanks for all your answers so far..