- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: IO problem or ??
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-06-2002 07:05 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-06-2002 07:40 PM
06-06-2002 07:40 PM
Solution1) Possible IO (from "LVM .. POWERFAILED")
2) Network link (from "MII Link ...")
The "LVM..POWERFAILED" error is accompanied by "SCSI Request Timeout" error and this usually means you got some kind of SCSI connection/termination problem. Check for loose SCSI cable, loose SCSI terminator, etc. ANd from the message it's pointing to c4t15d0 (1f04f000). I do not see this error ...
"pv# return to vg#"
which is good because if that appears the likelihood of a bad disk is high, given we rule out low timeout value of the disk driver.
Anyway you have to run STM to confirm your findings...
# cstm
cstm> map
cstm> sel dev
cstm> info
cstm> infolog
See if there is any error here. If not run exerciser. I can't remember the syntax but you can run "help" to list the command ..
cstm> help
The exerciser tool will run for a while. Run "map" occasionally to check its status. Once it is completed, view the exerciser log. Again use "help" to find out the exact syntax. If you can't see any error here, then it's due to SCSI connection/termination like I mentioned earlier.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-06-2002 08:48 PM
06-06-2002 08:48 PM
Re: IO problem or ??
you 're right
one of the disk is not detectek by system
disk 13 0/3/0/0.14.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE SEAGATE ST39175LC
/dev/dsk/c4t14d0 /dev/rdsk/c4t14d0
disk 8 0/3/0/0.15.0 sdisk NO_HW DEVICE SEAGATE ST39173WC
/dev/dsk/c4t15d0 /dev/rdsk/c4t15d0
disk 10 0/7/0/0.12.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE IBM DGHS09Y
/dev/dsk/c6t12d0 /dev/rdsk/c6t12d0
disk 9 0/7/0/0.13.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE IBM DGHS09Y
/dev/dsk/c6t13d0 /dev/rdsk/c6t13d0
disk 5 0/7/0/0.14.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE SEAGATE ST39236LC
/dev/dsk/c6t14d0 /dev/rdsk/c6t14d0
disk 3 0/7/0/0.15.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE SEAGATE ST39236LC
/dev/dsk/c6t15d0 /dev/rdsk/c6t15d0
Maybe this is scsi termination problem or the hardisk problem,..right?
But question again :-),..after I fix it ,.what should I do ?,..this disk is mirror copies of /dev/vgoracle/lvol1.
If the problem is the disk,..what should I do to get it back on again as mirror copies of /dev/vgoracle/lvol1 ?
Do I have to reboot the machine (..unfortunately this is production machine )
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-06-2002 08:56 PM
06-06-2002 08:56 PM
Re: IO problem or ??
Oh Oh ... not good.
Are your disks connected to the server with a hub/switch ? If so, check the hub/switch loggings for a link which has a lot of transmit/receive errors (and reconnects as well probably). That's the first thing you have to do, locate which link is failing. Next, you'll have to detect which component in the link is bad. This can be the card in the server, the cable to the hub, the port in the hub, the cable to the disks. In the best case scenario, somebody pulled one of the cables loose.
I don't want to make you panic, but I would address this problem as swiftly as possible !
Regards,
Tom
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-06-2002 09:12 PM
06-06-2002 09:12 PM
Re: IO problem or ??
I think that error comes from another app,..that we use veritas...
But again,..
How do I recover the disk ( if the disk is damage ) & put it back again as mirror coppies of one lvol,..need reboot ?
Thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-06-2002 09:17 PM
06-06-2002 09:17 PM
Re: IO problem or ??
Sorry, didn't see your answer ...
First, lvreduce the logical volume (to remove the mirror)
lvreduce -m 0 /dev/vgoracle/lvol1 /dev/dsk/c4t15d0
Then, vgreduce the volumegroup
vgreduce /dev/vgoracle /dev/dsk/c4t15d0
Replace the disk ...
If you find it in an ioscan ... the problem was the disk.
Next, vgextend the volumegroup
vgextend /dev/vgoracle /dev/dsk/c4t15d0
And finally, recreate the mirror
lvextend -m 1 /dev/vgoracle/lvol1 /dev/dsk/c4t15d0
Hope this helps,
Tom
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-06-2002 09:19 PM
06-06-2002 09:19 PM
Re: IO problem or ??
Extra add-on :-)
After you replace the disk and ioscan it, you also have to pvcreate it before you can add it to the volumegroup.
Regards,
Tom
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-06-2002 09:27 PM
06-06-2002 09:27 PM
Re: IO problem or ??
Since you system is still running fine you're probably ok for the time being until you can schedule a downtime to get c4t15d0 replaced. What you need to do is ..
o Shutdown and replace damaged disk.
o Boot up in single user mode ..
ISL> hpux -is (;0)/stand/vmunix
Then do this to recover your LVM structure to the new disk..
# pvcreate -f /dev/rdsk/c4t15d0
# vgcfgrestore -n /dev/vgoracle /dev/rdsk/c4t15d0
# vgchange -a y /dev/vgoracle
# vgsync /dev/vgoracle
# shutdown -r 0
At set !! Thank goodness you got mirroring !
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-06-2002 09:31 PM
06-06-2002 09:31 PM
Re: IO problem or ??
o Shutdown and replace damaged disk.
o Boot up in single user mode ..
ISL> hpux -is (;0)/stand/vmunix
Then do this to recover your LVM structure to the new disk..
# pvcreate -f /dev/rdsk/c4t15d0
# vgcfgrestore -n /dev/vgoracle /dev/rdsk/c4t15d0
# vgchange -a y /dev/vgoracle
# vgsync /dev/vgoracle
# shutdown -r 0
At set !! Thank goodness you got mirroring ! Assumption made..
1- all lvols in c4t15d0 have 1 mirror copy
2- your /etc/lvmconf/vgoracle.conf file is good
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-06-2002 09:36 PM
06-06-2002 09:36 PM
Re: IO problem or ??
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-06-2002 09:41 PM
06-06-2002 09:41 PM
Re: IO problem or ??
# vgcfgrestore -n /dev/vgoracle /dev/rdsk/c4t15d0
# vgchange -a y /dev/vgoracle
# vgsync /dev/vgoracle
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-07-2002 03:12 AM
06-07-2002 03:12 AM
Re: IO problem or ??
My apologies I did put you on the wrong track ... my procedure would indeed only work if the disk is still available.
S.K. and Michael, thanks for correcting me (without flaming me - which would have been just). I printed Michael's version because I want to try that myself.
Daniel, can you make sure these guys get full marks ?
Regards,
Tom
P.S. N/A for all my answers to this post please.