- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: ioscan & insf command question
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-15-2004 07:53 AM
04-15-2004 07:53 AM
ioscan & insf command question
I want to know 2 things:
1. Why doesn't HP need the insf command all the times?
2. Is issuing the above insf command in a multi-user mode recommended? I always issue the command in a multi-user mode and Iam yet to see any problem with that.
Thanks
Vinay
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-15-2004 07:57 AM
04-15-2004 07:57 AM
Re: ioscan & insf command question
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-15-2004 07:58 AM
04-15-2004 07:58 AM
Re: ioscan & insf command question
1. As far as I know, HP-UX requires ioscan followed by a insf to recognize new devices
2. Issuing insf in mutiuser mode is absolutely fine. It does nothing destructive.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-15-2004 07:58 AM
04-15-2004 07:58 AM
Re: ioscan & insf command question
To answer your questions:
1) IF the device already exists then you won't need the insf command. For instance /dev/dsk/c12t6d4 *was* in use months ago & then was no longer there AND you hadn't used rmsf to remove it. Then if a new LUN is presented & it's c12t6d4 then you wouldn't have to insf the new device into existence.
2) Yes - it's allowed. But you really don't need any parameters on insf - the command alone will create the newly discovered devices.
HTH,
Jeff
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-15-2004 08:01 AM
04-15-2004 08:01 AM
Re: ioscan & insf command question
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-15-2004 08:02 AM
04-15-2004 08:02 AM
Re: ioscan & insf command question
The reason I was concerned about issuing the insf command is because the man page for insf states the below:
"WARNINGS insf should only be run in single-user mode. It can change the mode, owner, or group of an existing special file, or unlink and recreate one; special files that are currently open may be left in an indeterminate state.
Many commands and subsystems assume their device files are in /dev, therefore the use of the -D option is discouraged."
So do you all think I can safely disregard this message.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-15-2004 08:17 AM
04-15-2004 08:17 AM