- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: IPSec between HPUX and Solaris?
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-25-2004 03:27 AM
02-25-2004 03:27 AM
IPSec between HPUX and Solaris?
Has anyone managed to get manual-keyed IPSec working between HPUX and Solaris {8|9} ?
I get the usual timeout / broken policy symptoms, although i'm sure they're ok.
For testing purposes, I will be using ESP only, with CBC-DES. Got my SA pair sorted for both boxes, and my policy seems to be sound, as between eachother (solaris-solaris / hpux-hpux / service level policy on ftp/21) all work fine.
Had a stab at it, but on HPUX it seems that you are unable to turn off ESP's authentication mechanism (with MD5/SHA1). I suspect this is where Solaris breaks, even though i've tried ESP with auth_algs of md5. (NB: not AH)
I _haven't_ as yet run tracing on either machine's ipsec implementations, but I thought i'd ask anyway, just incase i'm barking up the wrong tree, so apologies if i'm bypassing a FAQ or something.
Cheers
dan.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-25-2004 03:39 AM
02-25-2004 03:39 AM
Re: IPSec between HPUX and Solaris?
HP-UX can with enhanced logging inetd -l log all connection attempts. This might get you diagnostics.
With the ssh -v command you can get some pretty verbose diagnostic information on both ends of the connection which would lead to a detailed itrc post or perhaps a software trouble call to HP or Sun.
Since IPSec is standards based, I'd say what you are trying should be possible, though difficult.
SEP
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-25-2004 03:45 AM
02-25-2004 03:45 AM
Re: IPSec between HPUX and Solaris?
Hey there,
Thanks for your response - Sorry for the somewhat diluted post; I was more wondering if someone had actually successfully got HPUX - Solaris IPSec working at all.
I agree that it should be possible, IPSec being a standard, but I guess i'm at the mercy of the quirks between different implementations..?
I'll have a proper stab at it and get some detailed content together if I still have trouble.
thanks
dan.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-25-2004 04:04 AM
02-25-2004 04:04 AM
Re: IPSec between HPUX and Solaris?
I have not done that because I don't have access to a Sun box, nor am I well trained on that OS.
SEP
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-22-2004 03:53 AM
07-22-2004 03:53 AM
Re: IPSec between HPUX and Solaris?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-22-2004 08:14 PM
07-22-2004 08:14 PM
Re: IPSec between HPUX and Solaris?
HP-UX can actually do "static" keying (i assume you mean manual) with the new ipsec_config command.
However, i will try the ike daemons on both respective boxen.
If you could send me any config files for a comparison/guide, then that'd be fantastic!
Cheers
dan.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-27-2004 02:11 AM
07-27-2004 02:11 AM
Re: IPSec between HPUX and Solaris?
If you wouldn't mind sending me your config files, that'd be grand. Not having the best of luck even with IKE now. :-(
If you could also send some beer, that'd help with my frustration!
Cheers
D
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-18-2004 10:00 AM
08-18-2004 10:00 AM
Re: IPSec between HPUX and Solaris?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-18-2004 07:25 PM
08-18-2004 07:25 PM
Re: IPSec between HPUX and Solaris?
I've had FreeBSD and just about everything else working with IPSEC, but I used Racoon for IKE. (Have you used it? It's ace). If you could post your ipsecinit.conf that would be cool. Thanks!
I did actually get my setup (HP-UX <-> Solaris) working unidirectional with ESP, (from the HP -> Solaris:21), but not in the other direction.
I did even try in.iked on Solaris and ipsec_config add auth on HPUX for ISAKMP, but that didn't work either. I think this type of configuration is frought with peril due to vendor quirks and differences, but i'm not giving up just yet. Not that im trying it every day or anything, only when I have a spare moment.
Cheers for all your help
dan.