- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: Is necesary cache memoty?
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-26-2003 11:26 AM
тАО08-26-2003 11:26 AM
Is necesary cache memoty?
In the begining the cache eat 80% of memory, whe modified the kernel whit dbc_max_pct=2 the use of memory reduce to 18 %.
I need cache memory? or theXP128 have the cache for i/o?
If the cahe memory ins't necesary how i can turn off o reduce to min?
Thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-26-2003 11:32 AM
тАО08-26-2003 11:32 AM
Re: Is necesary cache memoty?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-26-2003 02:37 PM
тАО08-26-2003 02:37 PM
Re: Is necesary cache memoty?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-26-2003 02:42 PM
тАО08-26-2003 02:42 PM
Re: Is necesary cache memoty?
Tim.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-26-2003 03:21 PM
тАО08-26-2003 03:21 PM
Re: Is necesary cache memoty?
If you are running Oracle, you can also reduce the buffer cache's use (i.e. bypass it) by mounting your Oracle data (not rollback or redo log) filesystems with:
delaylog,mincache=direct,convosync=direct,nodatainlog
You need Online JFS to do this, but you may find that your performance will improve.
Regards!
...JRF...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-27-2003 07:54 AM
тАО08-27-2003 07:54 AM
Re: Is necesary cache memoty?
I have a Superdome 48way(750MHZ) with 72GB memory, with several EMC Symms attached... I left the local buffer cache intact and have all my DB filesystems with the options:
mincache=direct,convosync=direct... along with largefiles,delaylog,nodatainlog
My production DB is 1.2TB and my Superdome could not function if I relied solely on the OS buffer cache...