HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: Kerberos package and Virtual IP
Operating System - HP-UX
1833875
Members
1487
Online
110063
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-07-2003 05:42 AM
07-07-2003 05:42 AM
Kerberos package and Virtual IP
Hello colleagues,
we are using Kerberos in a MC/SG environment.
Several problems arisen:
* if we configure several packages on a node, we've several IP on the same lan card; it seems no possible to have more instances of Kerberos server, therefore just one package can ba supported by Kerberos
* if we configure Kerberos server on the physical IP address then the package virtual IP address isn't supported.
Does anyone know how to configure Kerneros in this environment?
thanks a lot
Enrico
we are using Kerberos in a MC/SG environment.
Several problems arisen:
* if we configure several packages on a node, we've several IP on the same lan card; it seems no possible to have more instances of Kerberos server, therefore just one package can ba supported by Kerberos
* if we configure Kerberos server on the physical IP address then the package virtual IP address isn't supported.
Does anyone know how to configure Kerneros in this environment?
thanks a lot
Enrico
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-07-2003 06:20 AM
07-07-2003 06:20 AM
Re: Kerberos package and Virtual IP
Usually when several IPs are on the same lan card they are within the same network. When a server replies to a message it will go out on the LOWEST lan interface available. This is generally lanX, hence your problems.
I THOUGHT Kerbros worked on the master/replica architecture. IF this is the case you really should not put it in service guard & utilise the master/replica functionality for the high availability.
One **FUDGE** & I've only seen it by accident on HP-UX 11.0 was that if you put IPs with different subnet masks as the floating IPs the return messages comes from the package (& not the base IP). e.g.
lan0 172.16.0.10, netmask 255.255.0.0
lan0:1 172.16.4.10 netmask 255.255.255.0
lan0:2 172.16.8.10 netmask 255.255.255.0
I've put lan0 on class B netmask (natrual)
lan0:1 on same "natrual" class, but subnetted to class C and lan0:2 similarly , but in different subnet from lan0:1. the above SHOULD??? allow packets from package to be returned from that IP???
Give it a whirl (on your testbed), good luck
Tim
I THOUGHT Kerbros worked on the master/replica architecture. IF this is the case you really should not put it in service guard & utilise the master/replica functionality for the high availability.
One **FUDGE** & I've only seen it by accident on HP-UX 11.0 was that if you put IPs with different subnet masks as the floating IPs the return messages comes from the package (& not the base IP). e.g.
lan0 172.16.0.10, netmask 255.255.0.0
lan0:1 172.16.4.10 netmask 255.255.255.0
lan0:2 172.16.8.10 netmask 255.255.255.0
I've put lan0 on class B netmask (natrual)
lan0:1 on same "natrual" class, but subnetted to class C and lan0:2 similarly , but in different subnet from lan0:1. the above SHOULD??? allow packets from package to be returned from that IP???
Give it a whirl (on your testbed), good luck
Tim
-
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP