- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- kernel parameter gvid_no_claim_dev on Itanium says...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-23-2010 11:29 AM
08-23-2010 11:29 AM
The command used to gather the data was:
/usr/sbin/kctune -P name,current,dynamic,next_boot
The HP documentation on it says it is not dynamic.
"Restrictions on Changing
Changes to this tunable take effect at the next reboot."
So, a couple of questions.
1. How could this be with some saying dynamic and some saying not dynamic?
2. How do I put the parameter back to saying it is not dynamic?
Thanks and best regards,
Larry
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-23-2010 12:32 PM
08-23-2010 12:32 PM
SolutionI'm having a hard time persuading my test box to let me set a User Defined tunable via stale entries in the system file at the moment -- but I thought that if you have a system file entry for a tunable and no kernel module actually defines that tunable it is interpreted as a User Defined tunable instead, and a User Defined Tunable would be dynamic in nature. With the gvid module being optional and being required for this tunable to be recognized as a kernel parameter, it does seem like a possible scenario.
Which would possibly answer (1). For (2), if I'm right it would be to persuade gvid to load anyway... but frankly, I wouldnt' force it. If gvid doesn't load, you certainly don't need it to claim anything -- so the tunable is irrelevant.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-24-2010 05:55 AM
08-24-2010 05:55 AM
Re: kernel parameter gvid_no_claim_dev on Itanium says dynamic
Here are the results of the command you asked for. The first is on an Itanium that says its not dynamic. The second is on a host that says its dynamic.
# kctune -v gvid_no_claim_dev
Tunable gvid_no_claim_dev
Description PCI Vendor/Device ID that gvid driver should not claim
Module gvid_core
Current Value 0 [Default]
Value at Next Boot 0 [Default]
Value at Last Boot 0
Default Value 0
Constraints gvid_no_claim_dev >= 0
gvid_no_claim_dev <= 4294967295
Can Change At Next Boot Only
# kctune -v gvid_no_claim_dev
Tunable gvid_no_claim_dev
Description PCI Vendor/Device ID that gvid driver should not claim
Module gvid_core
Current Value 0 [Default]
Value at Next Boot 0 [Default]
Default Value 0
Constraints gvid_no_claim_dev >= 0
gvid_no_claim_dev <= 4294967295
Note that the only difference is the Can Change line.
This is not a high priority. It just puzzles me in the inconsistency. The boxes should have been built identically. I'll check more into the hardware to see if there are differences.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-24-2010 06:19 AM
08-24-2010 06:19 AM
Re: kernel parameter gvid_no_claim_dev on Itanium says dynamic
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-24-2010 07:20 AM
08-24-2010 07:20 AM
Re: kernel parameter gvid_no_claim_dev on Itanium says dynamic
# kcmodule -v gvid_core
Module gvid_core [4B0315E2]
Description GAIA Core Graphics Driver
State static (best state)
State at Next Boot static (best state)
Capable static unused
Depends On module gvid:0.0.0
module libgraf:0.0.0
interface HPUX_11_23:1.0
For the host that says dynamic:
# kcmodule -v gvid_core
Module gvid_core [4B0B7C1A]
Description GAIA Core Graphics Driver
State unused
State at Next Boot unused
Capable static unused
Depends On module gvid:0.0.0
module libgraf:0.0.0
interface HPUX_11_23:1.0
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-24-2010 07:26 AM
08-24-2010 07:26 AM
Re: kernel parameter gvid_no_claim_dev on Itanium says dynamic
On the host that says not dynamic:
# ioscan -kfn | grep -i vid
graphics 0 0/0/3/0 gvid_core CLAIMED INTERFACE PCI Display (1002515e)
On the host that says dynamic:
# ioscan -kfn | grep -i vid
Nothing is returned.
Hmmm... It does not look like these boxes are built identically. This may be why there is a difference in dynamic-tiscity.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-24-2010 07:43 AM
08-24-2010 07:43 AM
Re: kernel parameter gvid_no_claim_dev on Itanium says dynamic
In this case, gvid is not a dynamic module - but since it isn't loaded (because it isn't needed) the same principle applies. If it ever were loaded, the tunable would revert to requiring a reboot to modify.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-24-2010 08:57 AM
08-24-2010 08:57 AM
Re: kernel parameter gvid_no_claim_dev on Itanium says dynamic
I'm closing this thread.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-24-2010 09:00 AM
08-24-2010 09:00 AM