- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Kernel parameter tuning
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-07-2003 07:00 PM
02-07-2003 07:00 PM
Kernel parameter tuning
In HP-UX 10.20 these was a Kernel template called "General OLTP/Database Monolithic System
"
what would be the similar Kernel template on HP-UX 11i?
Thanks
Shanakr
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-07-2003 09:40 PM
02-07-2003 09:40 PM
Re: Kernel parameter tuning
called "General OLTP/Database Monolithic System"
Cheers
Rajeev
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-07-2003 10:21 PM
02-07-2003 10:21 PM
Re: Kernel parameter tuning
timeslice should always be around 10.
My $0.02,
Jeff
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-07-2003 10:27 PM
02-07-2003 10:27 PM
Re: Kernel parameter tuning
At HP-UX 11i, the support of some kernel parameter templates were
discontinued. Contact the application/database vendor for their
recommendations. For reference, included below is a list of the
11i supported templates along with the list of 11.0 templates.
The template is like..
CAE/ME/EE Engineering Workstation (Previous Version)
EE Engineering Workstation 32-bit Kernel (New 10/99)
EE Engineering Workstation 64-bit Kernel (New 10/99)
CAE/ME/General Eng. Workstation 32-bit Kernel (New 10/99)
CAE/ME/General Eng. Workstation 64-bit Kernel (New 10/99)
V-class Technical Server
Cheers
Rajeev
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-07-2003 10:38 PM
02-07-2003 10:38 PM
Re: Kernel parameter tuning
There is no proper template.
Every install is different. You have to tune, to get the instrument to sound sweet.
Shanakr - search the forum for "Oracle tuning". You'll get tons of hits. You'll find a starting point - just log your mods & you'll find the sweet-spot. Rule One: One change at a time. Rule Two: Track results.
Rgds,
Jeff
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-12-2003 02:44 AM
02-12-2003 02:44 AM
Re: Kernel parameter tuning
I need details on the negative impact of tuning certain kernel params too LARGE, especially the impact on syscalls that need to scan all these frigging kernel tables. The params I'm specifically looking at reducing are:
NPROC
NFILE
SHMMNI
MSGMNI
SEMMNI
NFLOCKS
NPTY/NSTRPTY
NINODE
MSGMAP
SEMMAP
The current settings were "thumb-sucked" by a local HP SE that might have been a little intimidated by the SuperDome. My theory is that certain syscalls like READ, WRITE, OPEN, etc, are spending cumulative time racking through these tables. At several gazillion I/Os per day, this all adds up....