- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- lan failure simulation
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-24-2002 03:44 AM
тАО01-24-2002 03:44 AM
lan failure simulation
I'm doing lan link tests and I got an unexpect result. When I disconected all cables from one
machine, the other, that has all cables conected rebooted and the one that has no cables got the lock and still active. the
command cmviewcl show that lan interfaces wasnt
down.
Have someone pass throught this problem ?
Now, I'm just using core-io lan, HP-UX 11 and
MCSG 11.07
thanks in advace!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-24-2002 03:57 AM
тАО01-24-2002 03:57 AM
Re: lan failure simulation
Have you checked syslog.log for error messages from cmcld ?
Hilary
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-24-2002 03:59 AM
тАО01-24-2002 03:59 AM
Re: lan failure simulation
I do not run service guard but it looks like a heartbeat setting or a patch related to heartbeat.
Paula
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-24-2002 04:09 AM
тАО01-24-2002 04:09 AM
Re: lan failure simulation
Another thought.
If node A is running package & has cluster lock disk, and you pull lan cables from A (both data & heartbeat), both machines will think the other has died & race for the cluster lock disk. A already has it, B won't get the lock disk, so will TOC.
Hilary
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-24-2002 04:13 AM
тАО01-24-2002 04:13 AM
Re: lan failure simulation
David.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-24-2002 04:20 AM
тАО01-24-2002 04:20 AM
Re: lan failure simulation
A good test, can be disconnect just one network cable, look if traffic and addresses are conmuted to the other one. Then disconnect this other, I think package will be transferred to alternate node in this situation.
David.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-24-2002 04:38 AM
тАО01-24-2002 04:38 AM
Re: lan failure simulation
rather than ifconfig lan down
use lanadmin to reset the lan.
That should simulate it.
Or pull cable or wet the card!
I prefer lanadmin!
Later,
Bill
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-24-2002 04:56 AM
тАО01-24-2002 04:56 AM
Re: lan failure simulation
As previously said, if the node that stayed up already had access to the cluster lock disc, because ALL communiactions were lost, that node managed to grab the cluster lock diosc BEFORE the other node, and hence stayed up, forcing the other node to TOC.
You should definitely check you ar patched to the lates possible level, bearing in mind that SG patches are NOT included in the Patch Bundle CD's!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-24-2002 05:55 AM
тАО01-24-2002 05:55 AM
Re: lan failure simulation
Take a look at this thread from the SG FAQ, which tries to explain the scenario you are having,
http://docs.hp.com/hpux/onlinedocs/ha/haFAQindex2.html#All%20Networks%20fail,%20which%20node%20wins?
Here is the FAQ,
http://docs.hp.com/hpux/onlinedocs/ha/haFAQindex2.html
Hope this helps.
Regds
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-26-2002 06:02 AM
тАО01-26-2002 06:02 AM
Re: lan failure simulation
is not an correct behave.
there was a GOOD node on
cluster and this should
be up, get the lock and
take the ownership of
all packages running on node
that has all cables disconected. this one, that
have cables disconect should not get the lock because his
networks were down. if someone
have tested this on both nodes, please notify me
thanks again