- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Load balancing in Foundry Network
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-11-2006 05:36 AM
тАО01-11-2006 05:36 AM
We have network foundry geographic load balancers. We are thinking to route the request in a round robin fashion to 3 servers. Can we provide ip-weight of 0 against each servers ?
I mean is the ip-weight of 0 [ zero ] allowed or will work correctly ?
Thanks,
Shiv
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-11-2006 05:51 AM
тАО01-11-2006 05:51 AM
Re: Load balancing in Foundry Network
I happened to go through this link some times back. This helps a bit.
http://www.foundrynet.com/services/documentation/sichassis/gslb.html
Also why not use a CISCO load balancer for any applications servers.
007
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-11-2006 06:00 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-11-2006 06:26 AM
тАО01-11-2006 06:26 AM
Re: Load balancing in Foundry Network
Appreciate if you or someone elso help in understanding this.
Thanks,
Shiv
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-11-2006 06:31 AM
тАО01-11-2006 06:31 AM
Re: Load balancing in Foundry Network
This will deal with outages? Round Robin techniques don't work very well if they don't stop sending traffic to a server or network that is offline.
Is there an interface that lets you change load balancing on the fly?
There are appliances that do this kind of job as well.
SEP
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-11-2006 07:05 AM
тАО01-11-2006 07:05 AM
Re: Load balancing in Foundry Network
For the most part all our web servers have weight 0.
Bagley xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 1000000 0 1 No No
Rodgers xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 1000000 0 1 No No
(The weight being the 4th column)
The only time we use the ip-weight is when we use un-equally yoked machines in the same server mix. ie: an rp3440 in a mix with rp2470's will end up with weights so that the rp3440 will get twice as much as a single rp2470.
We found round robin didn't do all that great a job balancing, the least connections algorithm did a little bit better.
Hope it helps
John