- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- LVM problem
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-13-2005 09:46 PM
тАО06-13-2005 09:46 PM
LVM problem
Problem : last week-end, STK moved the fibre connections to new switches, added an array and adapted the zoning. Before this change, my lun's were seen through controller c6 and c4. Now after STK intervention, they are seen through controllers c17, c19, c22 and c25. I understand that I now see 4 controllers because they added an array, but I do not understand why the original controller id's have changed. I thought that the controller id's were dependent on the physical location of the fibre cards which did not change in my case ?
Any ideas ?
Bruno
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-13-2005 10:03 PM
тАО06-13-2005 10:03 PM
Re: LVM problem
You don't state what type of FC switches you have, so I'm assuming Brocade (B class) or McData (M class).
The controller numbers assigned to storage on a SAN is in fact dependent on something called a FCID or Fibre Channel ID. This is a 6 digit hex number made up as follows on Brocade/McData swicthes:
0xDDAAPP
where DD = switch domain ID
where AA = switch Area (on Brocade/McData this is based on an offset of the physical port number)
where PP = switch port (NOT physical port) - unless your are using arbitrated loop somewhere, this is usually set to 0.
So on Brocade/McData SANs It doesn't matter where the FC HBAs for your HPUX servers are plugged in, but it *does* matter where the storage is plugged in. Move it to a different port and the area (AA) changes. Move it to a different swicth, and theres a good chance that the Domain ID (DD) will change. Change from fabric login, to FCAL using translative mode, and the port (PP) will change. My guess is that in your case they didn't make sure that the domain IDs were the same even if they did plug back into the same ports.
If you look carefully at your ioscan output you should be avle to pick out the decimal part of your FCID in the hardware path, after the hardware path for your HBA, and before the target/LUN of the storage ports.
HTH
Duncan
I am an HPE Employee

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-13-2005 10:08 PM
тАО06-13-2005 10:08 PM
Re: LVM problem
Thanks for the clarification. The switches are Brocade 24000 switches.
I will have a look at the ioscan output as you suggested. I will also check with the STK person who did this intervention about these domain id's, area and ports, ...
Cheers,
Bruno
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-13-2005 10:14 PM
тАО06-13-2005 10:14 PM
Re: LVM problem
If you have the output of ioscan prior to the move, compare the new LUN H/W path to that of the old ones.
Hope this helps,
-denver
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-14-2005 03:25 AM
тАО06-14-2005 03:25 AM
Re: LVM problem
Can you give me an example ? Can I find this with fcmsutil ?
Bruno
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-14-2005 03:44 AM
тАО06-14-2005 03:44 AM
Re: LVM problem
Maybe I didn't explain myself well enough - the FCID is part of the hardware path - here's an example disk hardware path from a Superdome:
7/0/10/0/0.1.24.0.0.8.0
- 7/0/10/0/0 - thats the FC HBA
- 1.24.0 - thats the FCID of the storage controller converted to hex thats a FCID of 0x011800
- 0.8.0 - thats the vbus/tgt/lun on the controller port
If I change my SAN configuration, its only the FCID that will change in the hardware path, but thats enough for HPUX to treat it as a different device.
HTH
Duncan
I am an HPE Employee

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-14-2005 03:47 AM
тАО06-14-2005 03:47 AM
Re: LVM problem
You can look at some FC hw path decoding information in the FC support guide:
http://docs.hp.com/en/J6374-90018/ch03s07.html?btnNext=next%A0%BB
Marie-Noelle
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-14-2005 07:26 PM
тАО06-14-2005 07:26 PM
Re: LVM problem
I assume you have recovered data by importing VG's.
Regards,
Devender
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-14-2005 08:29 PM
тАО06-14-2005 08:29 PM
Re: LVM problem
Thanks to all for the explanations !
Cheers,
Bruno
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-14-2005 08:34 PM
тАО06-14-2005 08:34 PM
Re: LVM problem
i think u should look at the points u have assigned. 1 out of 152 (and counting) is not good.
show your appreciation to those who have assisted u in finding your answers.
regards.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-14-2005 08:41 PM
тАО06-14-2005 08:41 PM
Re: LVM problem
More that your thanks for your responses your points assigned to answers will be more helpful for forum.Your profile shows you never did that.
Regards,
Devender