- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- lvmpvg question
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-01-2004 04:41 AM
03-01-2004 04:41 AM
lvmpvg question
"Information from /etc/lvmtab differs from that in /etc/lvmpvg"
The physical volume that is referenced in this file does not actually exist (possibly removed at some point). Is it safe for me to simply remove the lvmpvg file?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-01-2004 04:48 AM
03-01-2004 04:48 AM
Re: lvmpvg question
Pete
Pete
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-01-2004 05:17 AM
03-01-2004 05:17 AM
Re: lvmpvg question
physical volume groups are often set up so you can guarantee that a logical volume you extend will go over a specified group of disks without all the bother of typing a hundred different disk device file names in your lvextend command.
Personally, I would want to know why the physical volume groups were set up in the first place, it was probably for a good reason.
However, you could just remove the entry for the missing device file from lvmpvg.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-01-2004 09:53 PM
03-01-2004 09:53 PM
Re: lvmpvg question
first, compare /etc/lvmtab and /etc/lvmpvg
and if it has diffrent device, you can remove it(/etc/lvmpvg)..
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-01-2004 10:02 PM
03-01-2004 10:02 PM
Re: lvmpvg question
Simply edit the file, and remove the line referencing that specific disk.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-02-2004 12:56 AM
03-02-2004 12:56 AM
Re: lvmpvg question
Cheers
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-02-2004 01:38 AM
03-02-2004 01:38 AM
Re: lvmpvg question
That file should only be "in use" when logical volumes are modified with the "strict" allocation policy. If lvols get modified when this file is not in place your extend placement could go screwy with regards to your lvol placement scheme.
This would imply then either a loss of redundancy or performance or both.
But as stated above if its part of a legacy configuration flow through and that specific disk assignments is not required anymore it can be turfed.
HTH
Gerhard