HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Mirror slower than primary
Operating System - HP-UX
1833074
Members
8431
Online
110049
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-07-2003 08:58 AM
05-07-2003 08:58 AM
Mirror slower than primary
I have an Oracle OPC two node setup and the data is in shared drives. The drives were organized in pairs to match RPM and size. Raw logical volumes were created and mirrored on each pair for Oracle.
Using SAR -d I find that the primary disk was busied than the mirror and the mirror had significantly longer wait (2x or more) times (avque, await, avserv). I checked Glance Plus on the LVM activity and found that the slow pairs were mostly read. While the pairs with write and read had relatively close stats.
All mirrored pairs were set for parallel synch and NOMWC.
Is it the read that causes this performance difference?
Is there a setting so that the read would be done on the less busy mirrored drive?
I have attached a table from SAR showing these stats. The drives are organised in pairs. Primary is on top. The last two pairs are for the rollbacks and archivelogs.
Using SAR -d I find that the primary disk was busied than the mirror and the mirror had significantly longer wait (2x or more) times (avque, await, avserv). I checked Glance Plus on the LVM activity and found that the slow pairs were mostly read. While the pairs with write and read had relatively close stats.
All mirrored pairs were set for parallel synch and NOMWC.
Is it the read that causes this performance difference?
Is there a setting so that the read would be done on the less busy mirrored drive?
I have attached a table from SAR showing these stats. The drives are organised in pairs. Primary is on top. The last two pairs are for the rollbacks and archivelogs.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP