- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: MirrorUX feasibility limits for 500+ GB FS on ...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-15-2005 07:45 AM
08-15-2005 07:45 AM
I have a rp3440/4 with a 14 slot dual SCSI channel JBOD connected and full of 300 GB disks.
The customer was cheap and would not buy a RAID. So I am stuck with MirrorUX for any sort of protection.
I have a VG with three 300 GB disks in it and one ~900 GB lvol. Yes, they want/need this size lvol.
Mirroring this to disks on the other controller is going to take a while.
I am just curious what the opinions are of the feasibility of MirrorUX on large lvols like this as well as beyond the 1 TB barrier.
Is MirrorUX only useful for root disks or small lvols?
Thanks,
-John
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-15-2005 07:57 AM
08-15-2005 07:57 AM
Re: MirrorUX feasibility limits for 500+ GB FS on JBODS?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-15-2005 08:03 AM
08-15-2005 08:03 AM
Re: MirrorUX feasibility limits for 500+ GB FS on JBODS?
As you've figured out the initial mirror will take some time. But after that you'll hardly notice any difference in write times. BUT what you may notice is faster read times because now the host can read from either of 2 places. LVM looks at the read queues & places the next request in the smaller queue - hence faster access times than w/o Mirror-UX.
And, yes, I would agree that a RAID would be a somewhat better choice in this scenario. But I don't think you'll pay a big penalty using a JBOD - I would've definitely recommended fibre channel however - but even a SCSI RAID would probably be noticeably slower than a FC JBOD.
My $0.02,
Jeff
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-15-2005 08:13 AM
08-15-2005 08:13 AM
SolutionAnd to save an IMMENSE amount of time, be sure to create the lvol with the mirroring option on the same line, in other words, this:
lvcreate -L 900000 -m 1 vg09
(which takes just a few seconds)
and not:
lvcreate -L 900000 vg09
lvextend -m 1 /dev/vg09/lvol1
However, if the 900Gb lvol has already been created, then start the mirroring and let it cook for a few hours. Note that the mirroring task can be safely done on a running system. The updates to the mirror take place in such a way as to keep track of stale and synced extents automatically. This task will definitely slow down overall access during the sync tiome, but once complete, you'll not notice any measureable performance issues.
Bill Hassell, sysadmin
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-15-2005 09:06 AM
08-15-2005 09:06 AM
Re: MirrorUX feasibility limits for 500+ GB FS on JBODS?
Thanks for the info on building the mirror at lvol creation time! HUGE time saver.
Initially I had thought of that but wondered how I could assign which disks were the mirrors.
I tried it and it worked!
Wear that Olympian wreath thingie proudly! :)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-15-2005 01:06 PM
08-15-2005 01:06 PM
Re: MirrorUX feasibility limits for 500+ GB FS on JBODS?
Bill Hassell, sysadmin