- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Monitoring the Health of VG00
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-14-2004 02:11 AM
12-14-2004 02:11 AM
Monitoring the Health of VG00
Also, when should LVM vgdisplay complain that its components are failing? On one system, dmesg/Syslog is spewing out SCSI errors like so:
SCSI: Read error -- dev: b 31 0x222000, errno: 126, resid: 1024,
blkno: 8, sectno: 16, offset: 8192, bcount: 1024.
LVM: VG 64 0x000000: PVLink 31 0x222000 Failed! The PV is not accessible.
LVM: VG 64 0x000000: PVLink 31 0x222000 Recovered.
LVM: Failed to automatically resync PV 1f222000 error: 5
BUT, vgdisplay/lvdisplay/pvdisplay/diskinfo still shows the components of vg00 as healthy...
Favourite Toy:
AMD Athlon II X6 1090T 6-core, 16GB RAM, 12TB ZFS RAIDZ-2 Storage. Linux Centos 5.6 running KVM Hypervisor. Virtual Machines: Ubuntu, Mint, Solaris 10, Windows 7 Professional, Windows XP Pro, Windows Server 2008R2, DOS 6.22, OpenFiler
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-14-2004 02:18 AM
12-14-2004 02:18 AM
Re: Monitoring the Health of VG00
The disk seems to be
0x222000 --> c22t2d0
Do a dd on the disk and check if it returns any error.
dd if=/dev/rdsk/c22t2d0 of=/dev/null bs=1024k
Do a pvdisplay -v /dev/dsk/c22t2d0 and check for stale extents.
Hope this helps.
Regds
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-14-2004 02:21 AM
12-14-2004 02:21 AM
Re: Monitoring the Health of VG00
If you not using EMS, you can use this product (free) to monitor the system and direct all root emails to yourself and other admins.
Most of the time EMS is able to alert root about any unusual event on the system, say a disk failure.
http://software.hp.com/portal/swdepot/displayProductInfo.do?productNumber=B6191AAE
Hope this helps.
Regds
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-14-2004 02:23 AM
12-14-2004 02:23 AM
Re: Monitoring the Health of VG00
If a disk is forced to do many re-trys to get data, the response times creep up. Beware of the effect of caching on arrays, but vg00 is a good candidate for this.
( this was a near constant when we looked through sar histories in my tech support days)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-14-2004 02:26 AM
12-14-2004 02:26 AM
Re: Monitoring the Health of VG00
What is the disk
I have seen this happen on a root disk when
AutoTrspass was not disabled
Doesnt mean HW
Also check patches
EMS is best advice
Steve Steel
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-14-2004 02:28 AM
12-14-2004 02:28 AM
Re: Monitoring the Health of VG00
Dmseg is not at all a reliable source for these messages because it is a circular buffer. I wouldn't restrict this to vg00 but for all disks.
Note that the PVLink recovered so that vgdisplay would display normally. You might find that lvdisplay does show stale extents.
I suspect most people who do this sort on monitoring rely upon a product like IT/O, VP/O (whateven the Openview name of the month is) because disk failure is but one component of a much larger picture. In fact, if all your disks are mirrored or RAID'ed then it's not even a big deal; you just need to know that a disk has failed. VP/O and its default templates handle that quite nicely. The other advantage of using the VP/O approach is that al the monitoting can be done from one location -- for all of your boxes.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-14-2004 02:29 AM
12-14-2004 02:29 AM
Re: Monitoring the Health of VG00
If LVM only flags this via the SYSLOG/dmesg messaging -- then I will probably just rely on this plus EMS on systems that we have it.
Favourite Toy:
AMD Athlon II X6 1090T 6-core, 16GB RAM, 12TB ZFS RAIDZ-2 Storage. Linux Centos 5.6 running KVM Hypervisor. Virtual Machines: Ubuntu, Mint, Solaris 10, Windows 7 Professional, Windows XP Pro, Windows Server 2008R2, DOS 6.22, OpenFiler
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-14-2004 02:34 AM
12-14-2004 02:34 AM
Re: Monitoring the Health of VG00
All of our monitoring are homegrown and we actually use Console/SYSLOG monitoring tools to flag for alert, etc....
Favourite Toy:
AMD Athlon II X6 1090T 6-core, 16GB RAM, 12TB ZFS RAIDZ-2 Storage. Linux Centos 5.6 running KVM Hypervisor. Virtual Machines: Ubuntu, Mint, Solaris 10, Windows 7 Professional, Windows XP Pro, Windows Server 2008R2, DOS 6.22, OpenFiler