- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- More memory issues - UNIX95= ps?
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-01-2003 12:59 PM
04-01-2003 12:59 PM
UNIX95= ps -eo 'vsz pid args' |sort -nr |head -20
First of all, is the result of "vsz" in MB's or 4K pages? Also, why doesn't this column add up to my available memeory?
Attached is the full output of the above command and swapinfo -tm and vmstat 1 10. After looking at this, I know most will recommend we need more memory. It just seems strange that the available memory has gone down on all of these servers. I recently applied patches to the servers and was wondering if there could be another problem before I throw more hardware at it.
What do you guys think?
Thanks again,
Greg
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Tags:
- UNIX95
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-01-2003 01:01 PM
04-01-2003 01:01 PM
Re: More memory issues - UNIX95= ps?
Regards,
RZ
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-01-2003 01:04 PM
04-01-2003 01:04 PM
Re: More memory issues - UNIX95= ps?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-01-2003 01:43 PM
04-01-2003 01:43 PM
Re: More memory issues - UNIX95= ps?
You're running Oracle.
More users/sessions mean more memory usage.
Leakage is a very real possibility though we have not run into that with our Oracle products. Or maybe we patched our way out of it, don't remember.
This is probably a kernel/performance tuning type issue. Is response time suffering, why are you thinking of throwing moer hardware at it?
SEP
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-01-2003 02:41 PM
04-01-2003 02:41 PM
Solutionkernel memory
memory mapped files
shared libraries
shared memory segments
buffer cache
Of these, the buffer cache is often the largest user, mostly because of a bad default value in the kernel (up to 50% of RAM can be used by this cache).
The total of all processes is not important if you are looking for a memory leak. Instead, look at the largest programs to see if they are growing. If so, then go after the programmers to see why this is happening--it may be normal.
However, the vmstat metric po is the most telling: you are severely short on RAM because you are paging dozens of pages (up into hundreds). The typical penalty is 100:1 for processes that must be swapped out.
Bill Hassell, sysadmin