GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: msa1000
Operating System - HP-UX
1850487
Members
2979
Online
104054
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Knowledge Base
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-16-2006 02:43 AM
10-16-2006 02:43 AM
Anyone here have experience with MSA1000 Array with hpux clients? I am looking for information on how high availability works with dual controllers in the MSA1000.
As I understand the documentation for the MSA1000, the controllers are active-passive. If the controllers in the MSA1000 are active-passive instead of active-active we will only get one link in hpux. (i.e., no alternate link for each device)
I am use to working with high availability fiber arrays. The usual configuration is dual (or more) controllers on the array attached to 2 San switches. Each Hpux host has dual Hba. Each Hpux host has one hba attached to one san switch, the other hba attached to the other switch. The topology is 2 seperate fiber fabrics providing visibility to the same Luns to the hpux hosts. With this common high availability topology, each hpux host has 2+ alternate links to each lun.
Not finding any clear documentation from HP on this. From reading all the docs for the MSA1000, appears Hp added support for Hpux as an after thought. MSA1000 appears to be mainly targeted at Windows/Linux.
Thanks for all your help.
Regards,
Michael
As I understand the documentation for the MSA1000, the controllers are active-passive. If the controllers in the MSA1000 are active-passive instead of active-active we will only get one link in hpux. (i.e., no alternate link for each device)
I am use to working with high availability fiber arrays. The usual configuration is dual (or more) controllers on the array attached to 2 San switches. Each Hpux host has dual Hba. Each Hpux host has one hba attached to one san switch, the other hba attached to the other switch. The topology is 2 seperate fiber fabrics providing visibility to the same Luns to the hpux hosts. With this common high availability topology, each hpux host has 2+ alternate links to each lun.
Not finding any clear documentation from HP on this. From reading all the docs for the MSA1000, appears Hp added support for Hpux as an after thought. MSA1000 appears to be mainly targeted at Windows/Linux.
Thanks for all your help.
Regards,
Michael
Solved! Go to Solution.
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-16-2006 03:07 AM
10-16-2006 03:07 AM
Solution
Hi,
the specs are saying
"The MSA1000 for HP-UX supports single controller configurations only"
http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/11033_na/11033_na.HTML
So there is no active/passive - it's in fact an active only config.
IMHO the MSA1000 is not the best array for use with hp-ux.
Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.
__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!
If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!
the specs are saying
"The MSA1000 for HP-UX supports single controller configurations only"
http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/11033_na/11033_na.HTML
So there is no active/passive - it's in fact an active only config.
IMHO the MSA1000 is not the best array for use with hp-ux.
Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.
__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!
If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-16-2006 03:43 AM
10-16-2006 03:43 AM
Re: msa1000
Michael,
This topic is still fresh in my memory, as I've been specing out various MSA1000 and MSA1500 configurations (along with a new HP Integrity).
Currently, MSA1000 firmware only supports active/passive controller configuration. MSA1500 firmware, which differs from MSA1000 firmware in that adds support for SATA drives, does support active/active. I've been told that an updated release of MSA1000 firmware which supports active/active will be out by end of year.
Interestingly, the MSA1500 QuickSpecs contain information on the MSA1000 that the MSA1000 QuickSpecs do not:
http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/11945_div/11945_div.html
Scroll down to "Family Comparison". Note that there are some errors in the QuickSpecs document, so watch out.
PCS
This topic is still fresh in my memory, as I've been specing out various MSA1000 and MSA1500 configurations (along with a new HP Integrity).
Currently, MSA1000 firmware only supports active/passive controller configuration. MSA1500 firmware, which differs from MSA1000 firmware in that adds support for SATA drives, does support active/active. I've been told that an updated release of MSA1000 firmware which supports active/active will be out by end of year.
Interestingly, the MSA1500 QuickSpecs contain information on the MSA1000 that the MSA1000 QuickSpecs do not:
http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/11945_div/11945_div.html
Scroll down to "Family Comparison". Note that there are some errors in the QuickSpecs document, so watch out.
PCS
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-16-2006 04:35 AM
10-16-2006 04:35 AM
Re: msa1000
Thanks folks, your comments have been insightfull. Looks like we need to wait a few more months for the active/active firmware to be released.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2026 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP