- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: NFS alternative
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-29-2006 05:09 AM
09-29-2006 05:09 AM
What is an alternative of doing this? I've installed Bastille on one of the machines, and it's not recommending NFS mounts.
Thanks,
f. halili
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-29-2006 05:57 AM
09-29-2006 05:57 AM
Solution1. Ignore Bastille's recommendation. It's a generic recommendation. Only your local security policies and system requirements can determine if it should be followed or not.
or
2. Maintain the scripts on each system. (Possibly rsync from a master server to make this manageable.) The depots don't need to be directly accessible on each server anyway.
Jeff Traigle
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-29-2006 10:52 AM
09-29-2006 10:52 AM
Re: NFS alternative
mount point there.
Lynn
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-30-2006 02:06 AM
09-30-2006 02:06 AM
Re: NFS alternative
Answer on your question depends on assigment of the file system, it's size and data importance.
If data size is small, the preferable solution is local FS with syncronization to the master FS by rsync or rdist, otherwise NFS is preferable. You can use automout NFS as well. This is very convenient, just take into account that this option has a small delay when mounts FS.
HTH
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-30-2006 06:54 AM
09-30-2006 06:54 AM
Re: NFS alternative
Note that patch and application depots do not need NFS. The SD product has its own network communication and is the preferred network update method. So on the depot server, just register the depots: swreg
And on clients, swlist -l depot @ your_server
To install a remote depot:
swinstall -s your_server:/fullpath-to-depot \*
Bill Hassell, sysadmin
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-05-2006 04:20 AM
10-05-2006 04:20 AM