HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- NFS lockd issue 11iv3 & redhat linux AS
Operating System - HP-UX
1826163
Members
4414
Online
109691
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-07-2010 04:09 AM
09-07-2010 04:09 AM
Re: NFS lockd issue 11iv3 & redhat linux AS
Hello
Yes, I am running the latest ONCplus.
I installed the latest ONCplus
when I started to "revisit" this issue
because we needed to go to Java 1.6
(I previously forced Java 1.5 on our users)
After looking over all the emails from
my previous support calls I am not
sure it is Java. Perhaps HP-UX is
misinterpreting the lock request.
--rochelle
Yes, I am running the latest ONCplus.
I installed the latest ONCplus
when I started to "revisit" this issue
because we needed to go to Java 1.6
(I previously forced Java 1.5 on our users)
After looking over all the emails from
my previous support calls I am not
sure it is Java. Perhaps HP-UX is
misinterpreting the lock request.
--rochelle
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-07-2010 04:45 AM
09-07-2010 04:45 AM
Re: NFS lockd issue 11iv3 & redhat linux AS
I'm not clear on why HP support can't identify this problem? Have you collected "good" and "bad" data for them that shows the problem? If an application is sending lock requests in a loop that's not really KLM's fault, but if KLM is not processing locks correctly that is our fault.
If you haven't already, I would collect a debug KLM log file from the working case and the failing case along with a nettl trace of the failing case and have HP support analyze them to determine if it's the RH client at fault or the HP server.
Dave
I work at HPE
HPE Support Center offers support for your HPE services and products when and how you need it. Get started with HPE Support Center today.
[Any personal opinions expressed are mine, and not official statements on behalf of Hewlett Packard Enterprise]
If you haven't already, I would collect a debug KLM log file from the working case and the failing case along with a nettl trace of the failing case and have HP support analyze them to determine if it's the RH client at fault or the HP server.
Dave
I work at HPE
HPE Support Center offers support for your HPE services and products when and how you need it. Get started with HPE Support Center today.
[Any personal opinions expressed are mine, and not official statements on behalf of Hewlett Packard Enterprise]

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-07-2010 09:40 AM
09-07-2010 09:40 AM
Re: NFS lockd issue 11iv3 & redhat linux AS
Hello David;
Well it looks like others have joined in the journey. It appears that after applying the following patch bundle:
contents PHCO_40211,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_36261,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_38040,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_38080,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_38681,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA,v=HP
contents PHKL_38691,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_38746,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_39328,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_39398,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA,v=HP
contents PHKL_39399,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA,v=HP
contents PHKL_39476,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_39509,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_39594,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_39606,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_39740,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40136,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40205,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40209,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40210,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40273,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40293,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40297,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40427,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40431,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40434,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40435,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40459,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40531,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40938,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40939,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40940,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40963,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_41008,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_41355,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHSS_39886,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.11_32/64,v=HP
contents PHSS_39887,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.23_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHSS_41099,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA,v=HP
contents PHSS_41168,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHSS_41179,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
end
and rebooting the servers we applied the patch depot to, lockmgr came up during the boot with no problem. Prior to applying this patch depot lockmgr would not start during the boot process. We applied the patches on 9/3 and checked lockmgr this morning and lockmgr was still running as a matter of fact it is still running on all of our hpux servers. So it appears the patch depot may have fixed the startup problem although none of the patches don't appear to have anything to do with lockmgr. I obtained the list of patches from swa, we updated swa and these patches appeared on our swa reports.
I took a look at the rc.log on the one server we had problems with and rc.log indicated that lockmgr did start, there were no error messages.
At this point I'm not sure where we go except to monitor the lockmgr process and try to catch when it goes down, perhaps a script in cron to monitor
Let me know if you have any thoughts.
Norm
Well it looks like others have joined in the journey. It appears that after applying the following patch bundle:
contents PHCO_40211,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_36261,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_38040,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_38080,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_38681,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA,v=HP
contents PHKL_38691,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_38746,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_39328,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_39398,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA,v=HP
contents PHKL_39399,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA,v=HP
contents PHKL_39476,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_39509,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_39594,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_39606,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_39740,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40136,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40205,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40209,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40210,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40273,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40293,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40297,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40427,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40431,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40434,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40435,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40459,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40531,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40938,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40939,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40940,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA,v=HP
contents PHKL_40963,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_41008,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHKL_41355,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHSS_39886,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.11_32/64,v=HP
contents PHSS_39887,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.23_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHSS_41099,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA,v=HP
contents PHSS_41168,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
contents PHSS_41179,r=1.0,a=HP-UX_B.11.31_IA/PA,v=HP
end
and rebooting the servers we applied the patch depot to, lockmgr came up during the boot with no problem. Prior to applying this patch depot lockmgr would not start during the boot process. We applied the patches on 9/3 and checked lockmgr this morning and lockmgr was still running as a matter of fact it is still running on all of our hpux servers. So it appears the patch depot may have fixed the startup problem although none of the patches don't appear to have anything to do with lockmgr. I obtained the list of patches from swa, we updated swa and these patches appeared on our swa reports.
I took a look at the rc.log on the one server we had problems with and rc.log indicated that lockmgr did start, there were no error messages.
At this point I'm not sure where we go except to monitor the lockmgr process and try to catch when it goes down, perhaps a script in cron to monitor
Let me know if you have any thoughts.
Norm
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Support
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP