- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: NFS mount vs. SMB mount
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-21-2006 06:38 AM
06-21-2006 06:38 AM
NFS mount vs. SMB mount
Thanks
Linda
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-21-2006 07:12 AM
06-21-2006 07:12 AM
Re: NFS mount vs. SMB mount
You will need the SAMBA (CIFS) Server product to export the UX filesystems to PC and other Samba (CIFS) Clients.
Similarly, you need SAMBA (CIFS) Client software on HP-UX systems to mount any SMB/CIFS export from the Windows machines/SAMBA servers.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-21-2006 07:24 AM
06-21-2006 07:24 AM
Re: NFS mount vs. SMB mount
right now I do this command:
mount -o soft /servername/directoty /HPdirectry
this shows as an nfs mount in my mnttab,fstab,checklist......
User can send files directly to this server.
The physical server is being trashed and the application is being moved to a diff server.
The network guy doesn't want to mess with Windows nfs for unix services on this server.
He suggested the samba mount.
I don't have the CIFS Samba software installed on my 9000. Is that what I have to do first?
Thanks
Linda
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-21-2006 07:44 AM
06-21-2006 07:44 AM
Re: NFS mount vs. SMB mount
http://h20293.www2.hp.com/portal/swdepot/displayProductInfo.do?productNumber=B8724AA
Installing CIFS-client will require a reboot.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-21-2006 08:50 AM
06-21-2006 08:50 AM
Re: NFS mount vs. SMB mount
Linda
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-21-2006 10:20 AM
06-21-2006 10:20 AM
Re: NFS mount vs. SMB mount
If you have Samba server, you will be able to permit your PC users to see data on your HP 11.00 box. You may even be able to join the box to a domain.
Note that if the HP box is mounting anything with Samba that runs on top of nfs client so you get nothing by going to Samba except windows connectivity.
SEP
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com