HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: Online JFS mount option for Oracle data file ...
Operating System - HP-UX
1834804
Members
2842
Online
110070
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-10-2003 08:51 AM
01-10-2003 08:51 AM
Online JFS mount option for Oracle data file system
Hello,
We have a system which have oracle running.The oracle has a huge concurrent reading request instead of writing request.I don't know if the setting "mincache=direct,convosync=direct" will still be helpful for oracle performance in this case.
Currently,we have very low read buffer cache hit rate when we run "sar -b". ( we have 12G memory and dbc_max_pct is 15%) which result in many physical read I/O. We can not use raw device or relayout file system at this point of time because the it is in production already.
Another concern is that if we bypass the system data buffer cache by setting the mount option this way,are there any bad impact like increasing of the CPU and Memory usage?
Our systemm specification:
12G memory
6 CPU
XP512 array
N-class server
I would appreciate it very much for your kind help.
liu
We have a system which have oracle running.The oracle has a huge concurrent reading request instead of writing request.I don't know if the setting "mincache=direct,convosync=direct" will still be helpful for oracle performance in this case.
Currently,we have very low read buffer cache hit rate when we run "sar -b". ( we have 12G memory and dbc_max_pct is 15%) which result in many physical read I/O. We can not use raw device or relayout file system at this point of time because the it is in production already.
Another concern is that if we bypass the system data buffer cache by setting the mount option this way,are there any bad impact like increasing of the CPU and Memory usage?
Our systemm specification:
12G memory
6 CPU
XP512 array
N-class server
I would appreciate it very much for your kind help.
liu
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-10-2003 09:11 AM
01-10-2003 09:11 AM
Re: Online JFS mount option for Oracle data file system
The answer to your question is 'it depends'. I can tell you that having dbc_max_pct set to 15% is almost certainly too large a cache. I would use bufpages to set your buffer cache at around 400MB for 11.0 and perhaps 800-1000MB for 11.11. Typically, I see better performance on 11.0 if datafiles and indices bypass the buffer cache using mincache=direct,convosync=direct and conventional mount options for archive and redologs. I suggest that you use nodatainlog for all mounts. You will see no measurable advantage using raw i/o over the advanced vxfs mount options which bypass the buffer cache - I wouldn't even condider the raw i/o option.
Under 11.11, I find that using the buffer cache for everything gives better performance.
The one other thing that you might find helpful is to
adjust the 'disksort_seconds' tunable. You may need to install a patch before this paramater is available. Search for disksort_seconds
for this patch. It adjusts the fairness algorithm for sequential vs. random disk i/o.
Having said all this, I suspect that by far the best results are going to be found by tweaking the SQL. Often, a single index can make a tremendous difference.
Under 11.11, I find that using the buffer cache for everything gives better performance.
The one other thing that you might find helpful is to
adjust the 'disksort_seconds' tunable. You may need to install a patch before this paramater is available. Search for disksort_seconds
for this patch. It adjusts the fairness algorithm for sequential vs. random disk i/o.
Having said all this, I suspect that by far the best results are going to be found by tweaking the SQL. Often, a single index can make a tremendous difference.
If it ain't broke, I can fix that.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP