- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Oracle 9i
Operating System - HP-UX
1755573
Members
3936
Online
108836
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-29-2002 07:47 AM
тАО06-29-2002 07:47 AM
Re: Oracle 9i
I'm running 9i on HPUX 11.00. I have 1Gbyte of ram and I get into some memory crunch problems too and I'm not in production yet. So, I'm still tuning memory and begging managment for 'a little more please' ( I get the same reaction as oliver twist did).
Two other footnotes:
I started with 9.0.1 and as one would suspect I had a lot of trouble with it. Especially dbca (database creation assistant). I finally got it to generate the installation scripts so I could tweak them. I'm on 9.2.0.1 and the dbca appears to be a lot better.
Also, I believe one of the other respondents meantioned it, and I would like to add support to the installation of Jserver. I have had some experience with 8.1.7 and 9.0.1. The java pool needs to be on the high side of what Oracle recommends. I had a guy in a newsgroup recommend that I take Oracle's recommendation and double it. So far, he appears to be right.
Good Luck
Two other footnotes:
I started with 9.0.1 and as one would suspect I had a lot of trouble with it. Especially dbca (database creation assistant). I finally got it to generate the installation scripts so I could tweak them. I'm on 9.2.0.1 and the dbca appears to be a lot better.
Also, I believe one of the other respondents meantioned it, and I would like to add support to the installation of Jserver. I have had some experience with 8.1.7 and 9.0.1. The java pool needs to be on the high side of what Oracle recommends. I had a guy in a newsgroup recommend that I take Oracle's recommendation and double it. So far, he appears to be right.
Good Luck
"Only he who attempts the absurd is capable of achieving the impossible
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-29-2002 03:20 PM
тАО06-29-2002 03:20 PM
Re: Oracle 9i
Although gigabytes of RAM is not inexpensive, the alternative is unusable performance. Oracle requires gigabytes of RAM to perform well. Less than 1Gb and yes, Oracle can be coaxed to run but queries can take minutes, even hours. Oracle is not cheap so it is amazing that IT management would choose to cripple this very expensive program with too little RAM.
If you are considering Oracle, don't accept anything smaller than 2Gb for 32bit versions of Oracle, and 4Gb (or larger) for 64bit versions. Management may say "We'll make it work" but the reality is that minimally acceptable performance is not possible with less than 1Gb of RAM. And the sysadmin gets the blame because there should be some "magic" kernel parameter will make Oracle run faster with inadequate RAM.
Bill Hassell, sysadmin
If you are considering Oracle, don't accept anything smaller than 2Gb for 32bit versions of Oracle, and 4Gb (or larger) for 64bit versions. Management may say "We'll make it work" but the reality is that minimally acceptable performance is not possible with less than 1Gb of RAM. And the sysadmin gets the blame because there should be some "magic" kernel parameter will make Oracle run faster with inadequate RAM.
Bill Hassell, sysadmin
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-29-2002 03:29 PM
тАО06-29-2002 03:29 PM
Re: Oracle 9i
Check this out from Kingston:
http://www.ec.kingston.com/ecom/configurator/modelsinfo.asp?SysID=+8813+&distributor=0&submit=Find
A 2GB Kit for an L2000 is $1,215 (US dollars). That is pretty darn reasonable if you ask me. I would go with Bill Hassell's recommendation and add at least 4GB to this machine ($2,430 US). I think you would be VERY pleased with the performance once you add that amount of RAM.
http://www.ec.kingston.com/ecom/configurator/modelsinfo.asp?SysID=+8813+&distributor=0&submit=Find
A 2GB Kit for an L2000 is $1,215 (US dollars). That is pretty darn reasonable if you ask me. I would go with Bill Hassell's recommendation and add at least 4GB to this machine ($2,430 US). I think you would be VERY pleased with the performance once you add that amount of RAM.
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP