- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- overhead using symbolic links ?
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-20-2002 12:24 PM
03-20-2002 12:24 PM
Is there lot of overhead when you use symbolic links to files that are accessed very often.
that is, instead of accessing
/dsk1/db/sales.db
you access it via symbolic link:
/home/sales/db/sales.db
where
db in /home/sales/ is symbolic link to:
/dsk1/db/
I would think there is, but is there really, and how much ?
thanks,
Sami
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-20-2002 12:37 PM
03-20-2002 12:37 PM
SolutionRegards,
Steve
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-20-2002 12:41 PM
03-20-2002 12:41 PM
Re: overhead using symbolic links ?
that helped. I guess I'm ok with my db-files.
however, I will take a deeper look at the log files that are opened/closed often via symbolic link...
-
sami
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-20-2002 12:44 PM
03-20-2002 12:44 PM
Re: overhead using symbolic links ?
as per what Steven said you would need to be opening thousands of files to even be able to start to quantify the degradation in performance. Hardware and disks are so fast these days I would not loose any sleep over the issue.
good luck
john.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-20-2002 12:52 PM
03-20-2002 12:52 PM
Re: overhead using symbolic links ?
There is only 1 level of indirection and the overhead is quite trivial. Adding this indirection more than makes up for it when you need to move the database files. You simply remake the link and you are done; no database changes are needed at all.