1838263 Members
3619 Online
110125 Solutions
New Discussion

Re: Patch distribution

 
Peter Lachnitt
Advisor

Patch distribution

Hello, I have to administrate 25 Servers with hpux 10.20 on it. It?s need mutch time to install the patches manualy. Are there an easier way to do this?
Peter Lachnitt
4 REPLIES 4
CHRIS_ANORUO
Honored Contributor

Re: Patch distribution

Do have a look at Ignite UX network server/client functions
When We Seek To Discover The Best In Others, We Somehow Bring Out The Best In Ourselves.
Cheryl Griffin
Honored Contributor

Re: Patch distribution

Ignite would be the solution. You can set up the server and identify which patches, applications, etc. to push to the clients.

The benefit of using Ignite is that you can administers many different machines with one application.

Check out the Ignite's information page at:
http://www.software.hp.com/products/IUX/docs.html

Specifically, the Ignite-UX Startup Guide for System Administrators will address this issue. Here's a description: "This is a cookbook approach to setting up and using an Ignite-UX server. The focus is on handling large replicated sites."
http://www.software.hp.com/products/IUX/docs/sysadm.html
"Downtime is a Crime."
Stefan Farrelly
Honored Contributor

Re: Patch distribution


Yes, you want the Software Distributor Push agent for ITO/Openview. This allows you to use a graphical windows to see your servers/nodes and to simply drag and drop software (patch) updates to them at the click of a mouse. Very handy for large numbers of servers.
Im from Palmerston North, New Zealand, but somehow ended up in London...
Patrick Wallek
Honored Contributor

Re: Patch distribution

I think I have to disagree with Chris and Cheryl. I don't think Ignite would be such a good fit for pushing patches to servers. Ignite is a good utility for re-installing the OS on servers, at which time you can install the current patches, etc., from a Golden Image you create. But if you already have everything installed and just want to push out the latest patches, I don't think re-installing the OS every time is such a good solution.

I would be more inclined to go with Stefans recommendation, although I don't have any experience with that product.

Installing the patches on multiple machines is going to be tedious and time consuming. I think the route I would take is to set up a server to house the patch depots and run the installs on all the machines from there. I realize that there would still be manual intervention on all machines, but I'm not sure I would want the patches installed automatically without my input. It would be too easy for something to go wrong.

Just my 2 cents worth.