HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Perforamnce issue... (dbc_min_pct and dbc_max_pct)
Operating System - HP-UX
1832645
Members
2686
Online
110043
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-06-2006 06:41 AM
01-06-2006 06:41 AM
Re: Perforamnce issue... (dbc_min_pct and dbc_max_pct)
I don't have time just now for a full reply, but I must quickly comment on:
"So, should I increase dbc_min and max_pct, lets talk... to 5 and 10... And increase sga max size to 3Gb? "
No, no, no!
What you 'take' from DBC (1% = 40MB) you can 'give' to db_buffer_cache, or visa versa, but you can not increase DBA _and_ increase the SGA.
Well, with 50MB free you _could_ give 50 - 100MB away, but that would be playing it a little close to the edge.
Hein.
"So, should I increase dbc_min and max_pct, lets talk... to 5 and 10... And increase sga max size to 3Gb? "
No, no, no!
What you 'take' from DBC (1% = 40MB) you can 'give' to db_buffer_cache, or visa versa, but you can not increase DBA _and_ increase the SGA.
Well, with 50MB free you _could_ give 50 - 100MB away, but that would be playing it a little close to the edge.
Hein.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-06-2006 07:44 PM
01-06-2006 07:44 PM
Re: Perforamnce issue... (dbc_min_pct and dbc_max_pct)
hi again,
i would also review the pga_aggregate_target parameter.
normally, you would start with about 500MB i.e. 1+ MB/connection
hoper this helps too!
kind regards
yogeeraj
i would also review the pga_aggregate_target parameter.
normally, you would start with about 500MB i.e. 1+ MB/connection
hoper this helps too!
kind regards
yogeeraj
No person was ever honoured for what he received. Honour has been the reward for what he gave (clavin coolidge)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-08-2006 08:35 PM
01-08-2006 08:35 PM
Re: Perforamnce issue... (dbc_min_pct and dbc_max_pct)
Hi Jefferson,
Sorry for the delay.
Resuming, I recomend the followng:
1- Size dbc_min/max_pct until you have a %rcache greater than 90%
2- Your processes parameter is not consistent with your sessions one: Oracle derives sessions from processes with the following formula: (sessions = processes + 25). So you should set those 2 parameters more accordingly: increase processes to 500, for example.
3- As Yogeeraj said, use pga_aggregate_target instead of sort_area_size (sort_area_size is retained just for backward compability in Oracle 9i).
Best Regards,
Eric Antunes
Sorry for the delay.
Resuming, I recomend the followng:
1- Size dbc_min/max_pct until you have a %rcache greater than 90%
2- Your processes parameter is not consistent with your sessions one: Oracle derives sessions from processes with the following formula: (sessions = processes + 25). So you should set those 2 parameters more accordingly: increase processes to 500, for example.
3- As Yogeeraj said, use pga_aggregate_target instead of sort_area_size (sort_area_size is retained just for backward compability in Oracle 9i).
Best Regards,
Eric Antunes
Each and every day is a good day to learn.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-08-2006 09:00 PM
01-08-2006 09:00 PM
Re: Perforamnce issue... (dbc_min_pct and dbc_max_pct)
Thanks all for explanations.
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP