- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: Performance Monitoring advice please
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-24-2005 04:22 AM
11-24-2005 04:22 AM
Performance Monitoring advice please
The machine has happily run for 2 or 3 years with no need for tuning / monitoring. So we no longer really have the expert knowledge to do this, and of course now we're getting performance problems.
We run Informix Dynamic Server V 7.31 and have recently migrated from the 32 to the 64 bit ports. Our problems seems to be worse since then. However we have also recently migrated our LAN infrastructure from NT to AD.
We're seeing two types of problem.
1. high load on the server which results in poor response times for users.
2. TCP errors and screen corruption or syncing problems in the client apps, which are simple terminal emulators.
Ok, now, for the first one I would like to use a tool like top, but one that logs the data so that I can look back over time and see what processes were running and what resources they were taking. Basically something that points a finger at a particular application or process, i.e. a user running a big report.
For the second one, we're stumped, Glance shows no network problems, we have nothing in the syslog on the server, not sure if there are others we should be checking. This may not be related to the server at all, it could be network problems, exacerbated by the AD upgrade maybe? Our network guys are going to run some monitoring tools on the section of the LAN that the server is connected to tomorrow hopefully, so this may throw something up.
Can anyone offer us some advice or a direction to go in please?
Thanks in advance.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-24-2005 04:30 AM
11-24-2005 04:30 AM
Re: Performance Monitoring advice please
Here is something you can go with and finidng something for performance bottleneck ,
# sar -u -M 5 5 [ Checking all cpu and their loads ]
# sar -v 5 5 [ Check system table ]
# glance -t [ Check system table ]
# vmstat 5 5 [ Check swap and paging activity ]
Check for pi/po values any nonzero value is indicating heavy swap usuage.
# iostat 5 5 [ grep for the disk u are suspecting loaded heavily . ]
# glance [ Phy Memory, swap etc. check ]
# top [ Check for cpu utilisation and top process ]
# netstat -n [ check for established connection]
# check syslog.log for any error.
# also check kernel parameter are specified correctly.
Hope this will help ,
Enjoy ,
hth,
Raj.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-24-2005 04:34 AM
11-24-2005 04:34 AM
Re: Performance Monitoring advice please
Thanks for the reply. We have tried most of these with inconclusive results. A colleague will post more detailed results tomorrow.
Thanks again.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-24-2005 04:53 AM
11-24-2005 04:53 AM
Re: Performance Monitoring advice please
Many people have Glanceplus Pak and don't realise that they already have software which is recording historical data for them. The product is called either Mesureware or Openview Performance Agent (depending on whether you talk to the techies or marketing!).
Anyway you can check if you already have Mesureware by typing:
mwa status
if this comes back with some meaningful info then you do have measureware.
If you don't, you can always follow the links to download a trial copy from here:
http://www.openview.hp.com/products/ovperf/index.html
(you might have to apply for a HP passport, but thats straighforward enough)
You can get all the data you want out of Measureware using the 'extract' command, although it can be a bit complex! An easier route might be to download the evaluation copy of Performance Manager (aka PerfView) also available at the link I suggested.
With perfview its very easy to 'drill down' to actual historical process data - exactly what you want.
HTH
Duncan
I am an HPE Employee

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-24-2005 06:42 AM
11-24-2005 06:42 AM
Re: Performance Monitoring advice please
From root's cron
# performance
55 23 * * 1-5 /opt/perf/bin/extract -xp -r /home/gwild/zgbltemplate -g -b today 7:00 -e today 18:00 -f stdout | /bin/mailx -s 'svr1000 performance report' gwild >/dev/null 2>&1
# cat /home/gwild/zgbltemplate
REPORT "MWA Export on !SYSTEM_ID"
FORMAT ASCII
HEADINGS ON
SEPARATOR="|"
SUMMARY=60
MISSING=0
DATA TYPE GLOBAL
YEAR
DATE
TIME
GBL_CPU_TOTAL_UTIL
GBL_MEM_UTIL
GBL_SWAP_SPACE_UTIL
GBL_MEM_CACHE_HIT_PCT
GBL_DISK_UTIL_PEAK
GBL_FS_SPACE_UTIL_PEAK
GBL_MEM_PAGEOUT_RATE
GBL_MEM_SWAPOUT_RATE
GBL_MEM_QUEUE
Rgds...Geoff
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-24-2005 07:16 AM
11-24-2005 07:16 AM
Re: Performance Monitoring advice please
If you have MeasureWare Software/UX installed , the above seems to be a very good script.
And also the primary tools (sar , top , vmstat , iostat, netstat, glance) need to be use to check system performance. Also you should know the earlier system performance and system behaviour , to find it out better way. And also need to keep attention to the system , for over a period of time. You may write script to collect data everyday or hourly basis.
Enjoy ,
hth,
Raj.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-24-2005 11:52 AM
11-24-2005 11:52 AM
Re: Performance Monitoring advice please
As far as AD versus NT, this isn't a LAN protocol, it is a PC administration tool and unless your LAN is severely overloaded, the AD switch may not be the issue. Look at lanadmin for your network stats. Assuming you are using 100Mbit full-duplex connection to your switch, there will be no FCS errors and no collisions. If there are, there is a duplex mismatch which will cause lots of errors (lost packets).
Bill Hassell, sysadmin
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-24-2005 10:16 PM
11-24-2005 10:16 PM
Re: Performance Monitoring advice please
As for the network traffic, I've used IPTraf under Linux but am unaware of a similar alternative for HP-UX. Also ntop, but my experience of that, again under Linux, is that it uses a lot of system resources - does anyone know of a similar, less resource hungry alternative?
Thanks for your help so far.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-24-2005 10:33 PM
11-24-2005 10:33 PM
Re: Performance Monitoring advice please
There are a number of kernel parametrs that are 64 bit specific that may need adjustment to handle 64 bit applications.
kmtune | grep 64
Then look at the settings for the 32 bit counterparts.
A lot of folks running older 32 bit apps never tuned the 64 bit parameters because they didn't have to. I got hammered by that policy at JUF when we migrated to 64 bit Oracle. Suddenly I had some tuning to do and it got worse as the Oracle Applications slowly migrated to 64 bit.
In the end our solution was to buy memory and tune the system and that made the problem go away.
http://www.hpux.ws/system.perf.sh
A decent set of tools, improvements on something HP gave me to deal with performance issues in the distant path.
Good Luck and let us know what happens.
SEP
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-24-2005 11:59 PM
11-24-2005 11:59 PM
Re: Performance Monitoring advice please
We've already configured maxtsiz_64bit and maxdsiz_64bit as 1Gb and maxssiz_64bit as 79MB
which I guess should be enough, according to the HP Tuning and Performance Guide.
Thanks for the input though.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-25-2005 01:24 AM
11-25-2005 01:24 AM
Re: Performance Monitoring advice please
UNIX95=1 ps -e -o vsz,pid,ruser,args | sort -rn | head
This shows the largest processes. If vmstat shows po more than 1 digit, the largest programs will be shown at the top of the list. Use swapinfo -tam to show actual swap usage. If the po value and swapinfo report swap space is in use (as opposed to reserved) then you need more RAM, or revonfigure your Informix database engine to use less RAM (which will probably slow down the database too). There is no substitute for RAM when performance is a problem.
Bill Hassell, sysadmin
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-29-2005 01:39 PM
11-29-2005 01:39 PM