1847858 Members
2174 Online
104021 Solutions
New Discussion

Pete Randels profile

 
SOLVED
Go to solution
John Carr_2
Honored Contributor

Pete Randels profile

Pete I was just looking to find out who you was when I discovered how many responses you have assigned points to its late in the day but it seems you have managed to assign points more times than there was responses to your questions how can this be ?

:-) John.

I have assigned points to 1391 of 1380 responses to my questions.
25 REPLIES 25
Pete Randall
Outstanding Contributor
Solution

Re: Pete Randels profile

John,

There are several of us that are in this situation and there are two explanations that I'm aware of. First, sometimes a post gets removed (for whatever reason) and the points assigned still count toward the total. Second, back when the performance was absolutely ghastly, I was able to hit submit, stop, submit and end up with two assignments for just one answer. I was experimenting with that one day and ended up "plus 11".


Pete

Pete
Steven E. Protter
Exalted Contributor

Re: Pete Randels profile

Take a look at my profile. I'm plus six.

SEP

;-)
Steven E Protter
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
Paula J Frazer-Campbell
Honored Contributor

Re: Pete Randels profile

John

Some of these responses were to question which are now deleted.

Paula
If you can spell SysAdmin then you is one - anon
John Carr_2
Honored Contributor

Re: Pete Randels profile

thanks guys

:-)
John.
Ganesh Babu
Honored Contributor

Re: Pete Randels profile

check mine.. it is in negative..

Ganesh
Karthik S S
Honored Contributor

Re: Pete Randels profile

It means that you might not have assigned few replies ;-)

No points for this please.

-Karthik S S
For a list of all the ways technology has failed to improve the quality of life, please press three. - Alice Kahn
Ganesh Babu
Honored Contributor

Re: Pete Randels profile

actually.. i have assigned points to all responses and none were deleted..

Ganesh
Karthik S S
Honored Contributor

Re: Pete Randels profile

Post this is Dan's ITRC forums issue

-Karthik S S

No Points again
For a list of all the ways technology has failed to improve the quality of life, please press three. - Alice Kahn
Ganesh Babu
Honored Contributor

Re: Pete Randels profile

Dan know it..

Ganesh
John Carr_2
Honored Contributor

Re: Pete Randels profile

Karthik

its ok asking for no points but i cant give you zero, this would make my profile show me being a bad boy and not assigning points to all contributions.ands yes i know there are some points i still have to donate on my other threads.

:-)
John.
John Carr_2
Honored Contributor

Re: Pete Randels profile

Ganesh

yours must be the best -1 !
John ;-)
Karthik S S
Honored Contributor

Re: Pete Randels profile

Hey John,

You got it wrong ... you will never become a baddie if you assign 0 points :-))

-Karthik S S
For a list of all the ways technology has failed to improve the quality of life, please press three. - Alice Kahn
Patrick Wallek
Honored Contributor

Re: Pete Randels profile

Yes, John, you can assign zero (0) points to someones response. Usually when someone says "No points please" they are *not* asking you to not assign points, rather they are asking you to assign '0' points. The choices in the points box is 0-10.

I assign '0' points to people in my humor threads fairly regularly and I keep up my assigned points ratio as well.
John Carr_2
Honored Contributor

Re: Pete Randels profile

I know i can assign zero but me personally cant do it to anyone who has given up there time to help, I must spend more time being clear in what i say :-)

John

H.Merijn Brand (procura
Honored Contributor

Re: Pete Randels profile

For the record, I was the first with over 100%, and that was because there were Opera bugs, so I could easily assign points to messages multiple times, even with Pete's `workaround'.

At the moment there is one member with 200% :)
1 message, 2 assigned

Enjoy, Have FUN! H.Merijn


All above 100%:

5204 1637 BR112852 V. Nyga Germany 1481 1479 100.1 2002 20031208 53 479 3.08
5205 20837 CA569821 Steven E Protter Usa 1404 1398 100.4 2001 20031210 1137 5044 3.37
5206 3236 BR716265 Jerome Henry France 245 244 100.4 2002 20031208 180 1068 2.59
5207 868 CA460479 Kapil Raj India 166 165 100.6 2000 20031205 51 236 3.02
5208! 1261 CA984331 Michael Schulte Germany 164 163 100.6 2003 20031210 82 +25 373 2.77
5209 24191 CA13182 Pete Randall Usa 1359 1350 100.7 1996 20031209 1396 4759 3.93
5210 2602 CA947949 JOHN YELTON Usa 134 133 100.8 2003 20031209 185 1061 2.09
5211 4843 CA615696 Roger Faucher Usa 104 103 101.0 2001 20031210 280 2759 1.59
5212 9391 BR41967 procura Netherlands 811 802 101.1 1997 20031210 467 1952 3.88
5213 499 CA749877 Martin Burnett Usa 83 82 101.2 2002 20020829 30 94 4.02
5214 6691 BR89052 Massimo Bianchi Italy 320 315 101.6 1999 20031209 367 1590 3.42
5215 578 CA589385 Vijeesh CTK India 118 116 101.7 2000 20030508 31 109 4.13
5216 1320 CA674949 Kelli Ward Usa 226 222 101.8 2001 20031117 61 326 3.41
5217 1109 BR760133 Antoniov Italy 160 157 101.9 2003 20031205 43 523 1.96
5218 3231 CA337265 Rajeev Shukla Australia 55 54 101.9 1999 20031209 224 584 4.00
5219 4240 CA6666 Rodney Hills Usa 54 53 101.9 1996 20031209 273 642 4.63
5220 65 BR751753 Priss Uk 95 93 102.2 2003 20030916 5 20 2.60
5221 581 CA674211 Dwyane Everts Usa 82 80 102.5 2001 20031205 37 137 3.34
5222 473 CA925906 Dave Duvall Usa 40 39 102.6 2003 20031003 36 80 4.08
5223! 1035 BR677580 George Petrides Greece 40 39 102.6 2002 20031211 66 +51 261 3.17
5224 26 CA771391 Sridhar Rao India 77 75 102.7 2002 20031011 1 15 1.62
5225 1646 CA799002 John Collier Usa 407 395 103.0 2002 20031209 43 532 2.86
5226 1063 CA852444 Ross Zubritski Usa 31 30 103.3 2002 20030830 42 296 3.14
5227 1092 CA265731 Dario Usa 79 76 103.9 1998 20030912 43 290 3.28
5228 1299 BR159605 Rik Tytgat Belgium 22 21 104.8 2000 20030318 80 328 3.18
5229 567 CA833843 Todd McDaniel Usa 97 92 105.4 2002 20031209 29 215 2.32
5230 67 BR686325 Kevin Lamb Uk 77 73 105.5 2002 20031015 5 18 2.91
5231 515 CA572665 James Specht Usa 49 46 106.5 2001 20031208 27 102 3.99
5232 427 CA417362 George A Bodnar Usa 27 25 108.0 1999 20030719 24 70 4.54
5233 619 CA913471 Dan Jackson Usa 12 11 109.1 2003 20031210 39 374 1.50
5234 314 CA804433 Joe Knudsen Usa 23 21 109.5 2002 20031203 16 160 1.78
5235 605 CA829867 Khalid A. Al-Tayaran Saudi_arabia 175 156 112.2 2002 20031104 23 213 2.56
5236 2535 BR622784 eran maor Israel 140 124 112.9 2001 20030918 150 502 3.89
5237 139 CA975424 Rob Tunisia 15 13 115.4 2003 20030926 5 72 1.81
5238 2798 CA808531 Ramkumar Devanathan India 16 12 133.3 2002 20031209 184 649 3.36
5239 6 CA17275 David L. Largent Usa 17 12 141.7 1996 20030605 0 7 0.86
5240 10 BR728018 Ben Hawkins Usa 3 2 150.0 2003 20030121 0 0
5241 5 CA934594 Daniel Gowans Usa 92 61 150.8 2003 20030926 0 1 5.00
5242 2 CA521521 Robert Holliday Usa 11 6 183.3 2003 20030903 0 3 0.67
5243 16 CA100318 Andy Mann Usa 2 1 200.0 2003 20030807 0 1 16.00
Enjoy, Have FUN! H.Merijn
Karthik S S
Honored Contributor

Re: Pete Randels profile

I am above 100% too,

I have assigned points to 559 of 556 responses to my questions.

http://forums1.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/publicProfile.do?userId=CA816088&admit=716493758+1071255980387+28353475&forumId=1

;-)

-Karthik S S
For a list of all the ways technology has failed to improve the quality of life, please press three. - Alice Kahn
H.Merijn Brand (procura
Honored Contributor

Re: Pete Randels profile

As you know, updates to my stats database only on wednesday morning or on congrats. you will be on the list as of the day after tomorrow :)

Enjoy, Have FUN! H.Merijn
Enjoy, Have FUN! H.Merijn
Mike Stroyan
Honored Contributor

Re: Pete Randels profile

When I try to compute my percentage it always comes up "NaN". ;-)
John Carr_2
Honored Contributor

Re: Pete Randels profile

Mike

speak to the experts !

:-) John
Karthik S S
Honored Contributor

Re: Pete Randels profile

Well my Windows calc.exe says,

Result of function is undefined.

when I tried 0/0 ;-)

-Karthik S S
For a list of all the ways technology has failed to improve the quality of life, please press three. - Alice Kahn
Bruno Ganino
Honored Contributor

Re: Pete Randels profile

John, i think that to give points is very well, but it must to be a pleasure, not an obsession !
Regards
Bruno
Torino (Turin) +2H
John Carr_2
Honored Contributor

Re: Pete Randels profile

Bruno

just for once I will make an exception you get Zero , it is a pleasure and its all about showing appreciation for someones input regardless of content :-)

John.
V. Nyga
Honored Contributor

Re: Pete Randels profile

Wwwooouuuhhh!

Thanks Merijn - the first time I'm leading one of your stats! ;-))

Have a nice day
Volkmar
*** Say 'Thanks' with Kudos ***
Bruno Ganino
Honored Contributor

Re: Pete Randels profile

Thanks John for assigned your point Zero, it is apprecieted.
I am happy because gives pleasure to You.
;-)
Bruno
Torino (Turin) +2H