- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- PHNE_23456
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-15-2002 10:59 PM
тАО04-15-2002 10:59 PM
PHNE_23456
I'm working with a deployed system that uses 4 * hp-ux 11 machines running a CORBA application. I read that there are issues with patch PHNE_23456 wrt TCP-IP and bogus data being sent to server. Can anyone tell me if they know how to reproduce this problem on a consistent basis or even have information on the bug synopsis if one exists. So far I have 4 machines...three have this patch and they crash intermittently and the remaining host does not have this patch and has never crashed. Seems too much of a coincidence to me.
anyways, if anyknow know how I can consistently cause the problem to manifest itself i'd be in a position to start testing it.
also, if anyone knows what the recommended patch level needed to replace this, I'd be keen to get my hands on it. The "working" host has just PHNE_21667 installed, I'm thinking of rolling the other machines back to this level if it's safe to do so.
sorry about the lack of detail here but I have no trace info at hand and this has just come to light.
thanks much for all/any help.
regards
GrahamO
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-15-2002 11:16 PM
тАО04-15-2002 11:16 PM
Re: PHNE_23456
Until then, it may be better for you to do as you suggest and back out 23456. Be aware that you may need to check on dependencies to back out any that may need doing.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-15-2002 11:55 PM
тАО04-15-2002 11:55 PM
Re: PHNE_23456
PHNE_21667 is not a patch related to PHNE_23456 !
You should check which s700_800 11.00 cumulative ARPA Transport patch is on your system.
But before you do anything like rolling back I would advise you to use Ignite to baqckup your current system status (VG00).
If you da not have the latest version use this link to get the B.3.6 version of Ignite:
http://www.software.hp.com/products/IUX/
Regards,
C.
P.S. if we know which patch is on the other working systems, we can come up with a solution to roll back.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-16-2002 12:14 AM
тАО04-16-2002 12:14 AM
Re: PHNE_23456
The behavior is corrected in PHNE_25423, which was released
01/12/12 BUT that patch has a warning regarding panic.
When this behavior occurs, a Data Page fault panic occurs with the one of the following routines at the top of the stack:
- tcp_wput+0x58
- tcp_rsrv_comm+0x18
- tcp_icmp_error+0x38
So like Malvyn suggests the solution is due in May and you have the option to remove PHNE_23456 while waiting.
Regards,
Tron
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-16-2002 09:04 PM
тАО04-16-2002 09:04 PM
Re: PHNE_23456
Geez, this forum kicks ass! Thanks much for the replies for far.
The only patches installed on the working host is PHNE_21767 which somebody mentioned is not ARPA related (thanks for that).
The broken host has
PHNE_20436
PHNE_21767
PHNE_22397
PHNE_23456
PHNE_25423
Last night it was restarted with just
PHNE_20436
PHNE_21767
PHNE_22937
installed and the hang occured again (gRRRR). I'm checking whether any of these patches relate to ARPA now and if any of them come with warnings. If anybody has any notions I'd love to hear them.
Thanks much...this forum lark is the best.
GrahamO
PS I did remember to score points BTW :)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-16-2002 09:07 PM
тАО04-16-2002 09:07 PM
Re: PHNE_23456
Just for the record.
Installing PHNE_23456 is definitely NOT a good idea. In our environment it kicks up hell with Control-M.
Regards,
Tom
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-16-2002 09:18 PM
тАО04-16-2002 09:18 PM
Re: PHNE_23456
I think it's the best idea to rall back all the arpa patches till you are left with PHNE_21767
But PHNE_22937 is a non existing patch, and I think this should be PHNE_22397.
Be carefull rolling back these patches.
Another suggestion:
If you have a software contract with HP, let them do a dump analysis from the crash dumps.
Might point completly in this direction, but just to be sure.
I hate nothing more than a production system that keeps crashing.
Good luck,
C.