- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Policy for Service Guard fail over for oracle
Operating System - HP-UX
1819687
Members
3694
Online
109605
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-12-2008 11:18 AM
тАО06-12-2008 11:18 AM
We are going to go to cluster for hp-ux 11.23 with 5 databases on them. We need to decide the fail over policy for oracle binary, oracle admin and database files.
Of course the database files need to fail over when needed. But for the sake of upgrade or scaling up and down the database, and any other event, we can have binary or admin in both nodes and no fail over for them.
Are there any pros and cons for different policies, or a best way for doing it?
Of course the database files need to fail over when needed. But for the sake of upgrade or scaling up and down the database, and any other event, we can have binary or admin in both nodes and no fail over for them.
Are there any pros and cons for different policies, or a best way for doing it?
Solved! Go to Solution.
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-12-2008 11:45 AM
тАО06-12-2008 11:45 AM
Solution
Shalom,
There are an unlimited number of possibilities even within the active-passive world.
Most common are that the data files are on shared storage and the SG scripts activate the volume group, mount the files systems and then open the oracle databases on failover.
Having the binaries on each node normally is a little better on the performance side. Thats where i keep them, though I sometimes use Ignite replication to make sure the binaries are exactly the same on both nodes before proceeding with SG configuration.
SEP
There are an unlimited number of possibilities even within the active-passive world.
Most common are that the data files are on shared storage and the SG scripts activate the volume group, mount the files systems and then open the oracle databases on failover.
Having the binaries on each node normally is a little better on the performance side. Thats where i keep them, though I sometimes use Ignite replication to make sure the binaries are exactly the same on both nodes before proceeding with SG configuration.
SEP
Steven E Protter
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-12-2008 11:50 AM
тАО06-12-2008 11:50 AM
Re: Policy for Service Guard fail over for oracle
Hi,
in our company we keep binaries in shared disks. So patch, conf. changes, upgrade etc. is no problem. But if you don't keep binaries in shared disks, if there happens a problem in a node you can roll back.
Kenan.
in our company we keep binaries in shared disks. So patch, conf. changes, upgrade etc. is no problem. But if you don't keep binaries in shared disks, if there happens a problem in a node you can roll back.
Kenan.
Computers have lots of memory but no imagination
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-12-2008 11:56 AM
тАО06-12-2008 11:56 AM
Re: Policy for Service Guard fail over for oracle
Hi again,
i found a document in oracle's website about their recommendations.
http://www.oracle.com/technology/deploy/availability/htdocs/faq.html#A311
Kenan.
i found a document in oracle's website about their recommendations.
http://www.oracle.com/technology/deploy/availability/htdocs/faq.html#A311
Kenan.
Computers have lots of memory but no imagination
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Learn About
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP