HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Poor Samba read perfomrnace across a DMZ
Operating System - HP-UX
1835088
Members
1838
Online
110073
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-18-2003 10:47 AM
07-18-2003 10:47 AM
Poor Samba read perfomrnace across a DMZ
Hello, we are running Samba 2.2.8a on an HP-UX 11i server and have encountered a strange performance problem.
Going to/from Samba shares to a machine in our internal network, a 100MB file takes < 1 minute to transfer. Receiving the same file from a machine on the DMZ to the Samba share, takes < 1 minute. Sending the file from the Samba share to a machine on the DMZ takes > 30 minutes.
The same file from a Win2k file server to the DMZ works fine both ways (< 1 minute for reads and writes). Our network guys have checked the port settings, etc. and found no anomalies.
Does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks in advance.
Going to/from Samba shares to a machine in our internal network, a 100MB file takes < 1 minute to transfer. Receiving the same file from a machine on the DMZ to the Samba share, takes < 1 minute. Sending the file from the Samba share to a machine on the DMZ takes > 30 minutes.
The same file from a Win2k file server to the DMZ works fine both ways (< 1 minute for reads and writes). Our network guys have checked the port settings, etc. and found no anomalies.
Does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks in advance.
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-18-2003 12:12 PM
07-18-2003 12:12 PM
Re: Poor Samba read perfomrnace across a DMZ
Latest version of CIFS/9000
http://www.software.hp.com/cgi-bin/swdepot_parser.cgi/cgi/displayProductInfo.pl?productNumber=B8725AA
Includes performance tweaks.
lanadmin -x 0
Replace the zero with the actual number of the lan (from lanscan).
Duplex should be what you expect.
Hard code the duplex and speed settings in /etc/rc.config.d/hpbtlanconf if you suspect you are not getting proper duplex or if any of the network hardware is made by Cisco.
Insist on explicit port settings on your switch, avoid auto negotiate unless your NIC is 1000 BaseT
Make sure you are getting proper throughput.
Do some performance data collection witht the attached scripts and look for bottlenecks. Run the transfers while doing the data collection.
Watch the network,disk and cpu with glance while doing the transfers.
General performance tuning.
http://www2.itrc.hp.com/service/cki/search.do?category=c0&docType=Security&docType=Patch&docType=EngineerNotes&docType=BugReports&docType=Hardware&docType=ReferenceMaterials&docType=ThirdParty&searchString=UPERFKBAN00000726&search.y=8&search.x=28&mode=id&admit=-1335382922+1058558917419+28353475&searchCrit=allwords
UPERFKBAN00000726
traceroute from outside and in, look for what IP addresses are taking too long. Could be a router IOS issue.
Consider a 1000 BaseT NIC if bottlenecks are found.
That all being said, I'm not sure I believe what your network guys say, but it never hurts to check out the system first.
SEP
http://www.software.hp.com/cgi-bin/swdepot_parser.cgi/cgi/displayProductInfo.pl?productNumber=B8725AA
Includes performance tweaks.
lanadmin -x 0
Replace the zero with the actual number of the lan (from lanscan).
Duplex should be what you expect.
Hard code the duplex and speed settings in /etc/rc.config.d/hpbtlanconf if you suspect you are not getting proper duplex or if any of the network hardware is made by Cisco.
Insist on explicit port settings on your switch, avoid auto negotiate unless your NIC is 1000 BaseT
Make sure you are getting proper throughput.
Do some performance data collection witht the attached scripts and look for bottlenecks. Run the transfers while doing the data collection.
Watch the network,disk and cpu with glance while doing the transfers.
General performance tuning.
http://www2.itrc.hp.com/service/cki/search.do?category=c0&docType=Security&docType=Patch&docType=EngineerNotes&docType=BugReports&docType=Hardware&docType=ReferenceMaterials&docType=ThirdParty&searchString=UPERFKBAN00000726&search.y=8&search.x=28&mode=id&admit=-1335382922+1058558917419+28353475&searchCrit=allwords
UPERFKBAN00000726
traceroute from outside and in, look for what IP addresses are taking too long. Could be a router IOS issue.
Consider a 1000 BaseT NIC if bottlenecks are found.
That all being said, I'm not sure I believe what your network guys say, but it never hurts to check out the system first.
SEP
Steven E Protter
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP