HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: "check_patches" reports error, should I be con...
Operating System - HP-UX
1834498
Members
2811
Online
110067
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-21-2004 03:30 AM
05-21-2004 03:30 AM
"check_patches" reports error, should I be concerned ?
Hello HP,
*******************************
HP-UX B.11.11 9000/800/N4000-75
*******************************
When I executed "check_patches" the /tmp/check_patches.report"
reported the following error :
============================== Invalid Patches
===============================
* Determining if any HP-UX 11.11 patches are missing the SD-UX
patch
* attributes required for SD-UX to handle the patches properly.
If the
* patch attributes are missing SD-UX does not treat the software
as
* patches, which can lead to unexpected results.
ERROR: One or more HP-UX 11.11 patches were not installed with
the
SD-UX patch attributes. This usually occurs when HP-UX
11.11
patches are handled by the swcopy(1M) command on an
HP-UX 10.X system, which does not recognize these
attributes,
and the patch attributes are lost. The absence of these
patch attributes will cause SD-UX on HP-UX 11.11 to
treat
these patches inappropriately.
Due to the severity of this issue, it is recommended
that the
software affected by these patches be reloaded. Once
the
software has been reloaded, the patches should be
reapplied
from a known good source insuring that the swinstall(1M)
'patch_match_target=true' option is used.
The following HP-UX 11.11 patches are missing the SD-UX
patch
attributes:
PHSS_28610 N4000/rp7400 43.22 PDC Firmware
Patch
***********************************************************
it-hp36 [/tmp]# swlist -l product | grep -i 28610
PHSS_28610 1.0 N4000/rp7400 43.22 PDC
Firmware Patch
it-hp36 [/tmp]# swlist -l fileset -a state | grep -i 28610
# PHSS_28610
PHSS_28610.KERN-RUN configured
***********************************************************
Info from "swagent.log"
======= 02/03/04 14:34:38 PST BEGIN install AGENT SESSION
(pid=19633)
* Agent session started for user "root@it-
hp36.peoplesoft.com".
(pid=19633)
* Beginning Analysis Phase.
* Source:
it-hp36.peoplesoft.com:/software/PDC_FIRMWARE.43.22
* Target: it-hp36:/
* Target logfile: it-hp36:/var/adm/sw/swagent.log
* Reading source for product information.
* Reading source for file information.
* Executing preDSA command.
NOTE: The used disk space on filesystem "/usr" is estimated to
increase by 2160 Kbytes.
This will leave 1458656 Kbytes of available user disk
space
after the installation.
NOTE: The used disk space on filesystem "/var" is estimated to
increase by 24 Kbytes.
This will leave 4139368 Kbytes of available user disk
space
after the installation.
* Summary of Analysis Phase:
* 1 of 1 filesets had no Errors or Warnings.
* The Analysis Phase succeeded.
* Beginning the Install Execution Phase.
* Filesets: 1
* Files: 3
* Kbytes: 2150
* Installing bundle "BUNDLE,r=B.." because it is
a "reference"
bundle and one or more of its contained filesets is
being
installed.
* Installing fileset "PHSS_28610.KERN-RUN,r=1.0" (1 of 1).
* Running install clean
command /usr/lbin/sw/install_clean.
NOTE: tlinstall is searching filesystem - please be patient
NOTE: Successfully completed
* Building the software file "/var/adm/sw/needs_config"
to be
used for post-reboot "swconfig" execution. The
information in
this file will be used as input to "swconfig" after the
system
reboots.
* Summary of Execution Phase:
* 1 of 1 filesets had no Errors or Warnings.
* The Execution Phase succeeded.
NOTE: Because software requiring a system reboot has been
installed,
the system will now be rebooted.
NOTE: The system must be configured after it is rebooted. If
the
"swconfig" command does not succeed during the startup
process, you may run the "swconfig" command manually
after the system boots successfully.
======= 02/03/04 14:37:53 PST END install AGENT SESSION
(Rebooting
System) (pid=19633)
======= 02/03/04 15:08:25 PST BEGIN configure AGENT SESSION
(pid=617)
(jobid=it-hp36-0029)
* Agent session started for user "root@it-
hp36.peoplesoft.com".
(pid=617)
* Beginning Analysis Phase.
* Target: it-hp36:/
* Target logfile: it-hp36:/var/adm/sw/swagent.log
* Reading source for file information.
NOTE: The filesystems in the filesystem table will not be
checked
against those currently mounted because the
"mount_all_filesystems" option is set to "false".
* Summary of Analysis Phase:
* 1 of 1 filesets had no Errors or Warnings.
* The Analysis Phase succeeded.
* Beginning the Configure Execution Phase.
* Filesets: 1
* Running config clean command /usr/lbin/sw/config_clean.
* Summary of Execution Phase:
* 1 of 1 filesets had no Errors or Warnings.
* The Execution Phase succeeded.
********************************************************
*** Callback comment ***
*******************************
HP-UX B.11.11 9000/800/N4000-75
*******************************
When I executed "check_patches" the /tmp/check_patches.report"
reported the following error :
============================== Invalid Patches
===============================
* Determining if any HP-UX 11.11 patches are missing the SD-UX
patch
* attributes required for SD-UX to handle the patches properly.
If the
* patch attributes are missing SD-UX does not treat the software
as
* patches, which can lead to unexpected results.
ERROR: One or more HP-UX 11.11 patches were not installed with
the
SD-UX patch attributes. This usually occurs when HP-UX
11.11
patches are handled by the swcopy(1M) command on an
HP-UX 10.X system, which does not recognize these
attributes,
and the patch attributes are lost. The absence of these
patch attributes will cause SD-UX on HP-UX 11.11 to
treat
these patches inappropriately.
Due to the severity of this issue, it is recommended
that the
software affected by these patches be reloaded. Once
the
software has been reloaded, the patches should be
reapplied
from a known good source insuring that the swinstall(1M)
'patch_match_target=true' option is used.
The following HP-UX 11.11 patches are missing the SD-UX
patch
attributes:
PHSS_28610 N4000/rp7400 43.22 PDC Firmware
Patch
***********************************************************
it-hp36 [/tmp]# swlist -l product | grep -i 28610
PHSS_28610 1.0 N4000/rp7400 43.22 PDC
Firmware Patch
it-hp36 [/tmp]# swlist -l fileset -a state | grep -i 28610
# PHSS_28610
PHSS_28610.KERN-RUN configured
***********************************************************
Info from "swagent.log"
======= 02/03/04 14:34:38 PST BEGIN install AGENT SESSION
(pid=19633)
* Agent session started for user "root@it-
hp36.peoplesoft.com".
(pid=19633)
* Beginning Analysis Phase.
* Source:
it-hp36.peoplesoft.com:/software/PDC_FIRMWARE.43.22
* Target: it-hp36:/
* Target logfile: it-hp36:/var/adm/sw/swagent.log
* Reading source for product information.
* Reading source for file information.
* Executing preDSA command.
NOTE: The used disk space on filesystem "/usr" is estimated to
increase by 2160 Kbytes.
This will leave 1458656 Kbytes of available user disk
space
after the installation.
NOTE: The used disk space on filesystem "/var" is estimated to
increase by 24 Kbytes.
This will leave 4139368 Kbytes of available user disk
space
after the installation.
* Summary of Analysis Phase:
* 1 of 1 filesets had no Errors or Warnings.
* The Analysis Phase succeeded.
* Beginning the Install Execution Phase.
* Filesets: 1
* Files: 3
* Kbytes: 2150
* Installing bundle "BUNDLE,r=B.." because it is
a "reference"
bundle and one or more of its contained filesets is
being
installed.
* Installing fileset "PHSS_28610.KERN-RUN,r=1.0" (1 of 1).
* Running install clean
command /usr/lbin/sw/install_clean.
NOTE: tlinstall is searching filesystem - please be patient
NOTE: Successfully completed
* Building the software file "/var/adm/sw/needs_config"
to be
used for post-reboot "swconfig" execution. The
information in
this file will be used as input to "swconfig" after the
system
reboots.
* Summary of Execution Phase:
* 1 of 1 filesets had no Errors or Warnings.
* The Execution Phase succeeded.
NOTE: Because software requiring a system reboot has been
installed,
the system will now be rebooted.
NOTE: The system must be configured after it is rebooted. If
the
"swconfig" command does not succeed during the startup
process, you may run the "swconfig" command manually
after the system boots successfully.
======= 02/03/04 14:37:53 PST END install AGENT SESSION
(Rebooting
System) (pid=19633)
======= 02/03/04 15:08:25 PST BEGIN configure AGENT SESSION
(pid=617)
(jobid=it-hp36-0029)
* Agent session started for user "root@it-
hp36.peoplesoft.com".
(pid=617)
* Beginning Analysis Phase.
* Target: it-hp36:/
* Target logfile: it-hp36:/var/adm/sw/swagent.log
* Reading source for file information.
NOTE: The filesystems in the filesystem table will not be
checked
against those currently mounted because the
"mount_all_filesystems" option is set to "false".
* Summary of Analysis Phase:
* 1 of 1 filesets had no Errors or Warnings.
* The Analysis Phase succeeded.
* Beginning the Configure Execution Phase.
* Filesets: 1
* Running config clean command /usr/lbin/sw/config_clean.
* Summary of Execution Phase:
* 1 of 1 filesets had no Errors or Warnings.
* The Execution Phase succeeded.
********************************************************
*** Callback comment ***
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-21-2004 04:52 AM
05-21-2004 04:52 AM
Re: "check_patches" reports error, should I be concerned ?
as far as I can see from the patch database, this is a firmware patch and if it went in fine and your system came back up after the reboot, I would not worry about it. All swcheck is complaining is a patch database inconsistency. As a matter of fact, re-installing this patch (i.e. re-updating the firmware) with the same firmware revision may have some unexpected (read as : nasty) effects.
Personally, I would not do it.
Personally, I would not do it.
________________________________
UNIX because I majored in cryptology...
UNIX because I majored in cryptology...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-21-2004 05:20 AM
05-21-2004 05:20 AM
Re: "check_patches" reports error, should I be concerned ?
Concerned: Yes.
Reinstall a firmware patch: No.
Open a software case with HP to clear up the consistency problem in the sd-ux database: Yes.
I echo the first responses concerns with regards to running the firmware upgade again.
SEP
Reinstall a firmware patch: No.
Open a software case with HP to clear up the consistency problem in the sd-ux database: Yes.
I echo the first responses concerns with regards to running the firmware upgade again.
SEP
Steven E Protter
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-21-2004 05:22 AM
05-21-2004 05:22 AM
Re: "check_patches" reports error, should I be concerned ?
Thanks for the response.
I was given the following advice for
Call 3206276210:
Usually when this occurs, there may not be a /var/adm/sw/save/PHxx_yyyyy
directory so DO NOT try and swremove the patch.
Execute swmodify for each patch in this state to remove its reference
from the IPD.
swmodify -u PHxx_yyyyy.\* PHxx_yyyyy
Verify that the source depot does not contain any patches with
data_model_revision 2.10.
data_model_revision 2.10 is for 10.20 .
cd to source depot
find . -name INDEX -exec grep -l "data_model_revision 2.10" {} \; | more
If any are found, they will need to be swremoved from the source depot and a
good patch-source swcopied to the source depot.
Now swinstall the patches that were flagged by the check_patches.report,
insuring that the 'patch_match_target=true' option is used.
**************************
And yes I show the "data_model_revision 2.10"
as follows:
# [/software/PDC_FIRMWARE.43.22]# find . -name INDEX -exec grep -l "data_model_revision 2.10" {} \; | more
./catalog/dfiles/INDEX
./catalog/INDEX
./catalog/PHSS_28610/pfiles/INDEX
./catalog/PHSS_28610/KERN-RUN/INDEX
./catalog/BUNDLE/pfiles/INDEX
# [/software/PDC_FIRMWARE.43.22]# find . -name INDEX -exec grep -i "data_model_revision 2.10" {} \; | more
data_model_revision 2.10
data_model_revision 2.10
data_model_revision 2.10
data_model_revision 2.10
data_model_revision 2.10
data_model_revision 2.10
data_model_revision 2.10
data_model_revision 2.10
********************************
But I don't think I'm going to change anything.
I was given the following advice for
Call 3206276210:
Usually when this occurs, there may not be a /var/adm/sw/save/PHxx_yyyyy
directory so DO NOT try and swremove the patch.
Execute swmodify for each patch in this state to remove its reference
from the IPD.
swmodify -u PHxx_yyyyy.\* PHxx_yyyyy
Verify that the source depot does not contain any patches with
data_model_revision 2.10.
data_model_revision 2.10 is for 10.20 .
cd to source depot
find . -name INDEX -exec grep -l "data_model_revision 2.10" {} \; | more
If any are found, they will need to be swremoved from the source depot and a
good patch-source swcopied to the source depot.
Now swinstall the patches that were flagged by the check_patches.report,
insuring that the 'patch_match_target=true' option is used.
**************************
And yes I show the "data_model_revision 2.10"
as follows:
# [/software/PDC_FIRMWARE.43.22]# find . -name INDEX -exec grep -l "data_model_revision 2.10" {} \; | more
./catalog/dfiles/INDEX
./catalog/INDEX
./catalog/PHSS_28610/pfiles/INDEX
./catalog/PHSS_28610/KERN-RUN/INDEX
./catalog/BUNDLE/pfiles/INDEX
# [/software/PDC_FIRMWARE.43.22]# find . -name INDEX -exec grep -i "data_model_revision 2.10" {} \; | more
data_model_revision 2.10
data_model_revision 2.10
data_model_revision 2.10
data_model_revision 2.10
data_model_revision 2.10
data_model_revision 2.10
data_model_revision 2.10
data_model_revision 2.10
********************************
But I don't think I'm going to change anything.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP