- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: "LogicalExtentsNumber" is not bigger than curr...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-26-2006 08:56 AM
05-26-2006 08:56 AM
"LogicalExtentsNumber" is not bigger than current setting
This is the third time I've seen this message on three different servers, with hp-ux 11.00
"LogicalExtentsNumber" is not bigger than current setting, when extending a Filsystem.
I've already logged this with HP, but got a answer that the FS has already been extended before.
Thanks,
Darrel
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-26-2006 09:02 AM
05-26-2006 09:02 AM
Re: "LogicalExtentsNumber" is not bigger than current setting
What HP says is true. The logical volume may have been extended, but if the filesystem was not extended then you do not have use of the space.
An 'lvdisplay -v' for the LV in question should confirm this.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-26-2006 09:23 AM
05-26-2006 09:23 AM
Re: "LogicalExtentsNumber" is not bigger than current setting
I Can't agree with you.
I've just extended the FS with 24 Mb, see below.
lvdisplay -v /dev/vg00/lvol5
--- Logical volumes ---
LV Name /dev/vg00/lvol5
VG Name /dev/vg00
LV Permission read/write
LV Status available/syncd
Mirror copies 1
Consistency Recovery MWC
Schedule parallel
LV Size (Mbytes) 1124
Current LE 281
Allocated PE 562
Stripes 0
Stripe Size (Kbytes) 0
Bad block on
Allocation strict
IO Timeout (Seconds) default
--- Distribution of logical volume ---
PV Name LE on PV PE on PV
/dev/dsk/c1t6d0 281 281
/dev/dsk/c2t6d0 281 281
Logical volume "/dev/vg00/lvol5" has been successfully extended.
Volume Group configuration for /dev/vg00 has been saved in /etc/lvmconf/vg00.conf
lvextend: "LogicalExtentsNumber" is not bigger than current setting.
fsadm: /dev/vg00/rlvol5 is currently 1150976 sectors - size will be increased
lvdisplay -v /dev/vg00/lvol5
--- Logical volumes ---
LV Name /dev/vg00/lvol5
VG Name /dev/vg00
LV Permission read/write
LV Status available/syncd
Mirror copies 1
Consistency Recovery MWC
Schedule parallel
LV Size (Mbytes) 1148
Current LE 287
Allocated PE 574
Stripes 0
Stripe Size (Kbytes) 0
Bad block on
Allocation strict
IO Timeout (Seconds) default
--- Distribution of logical volume ---
PV Name LE on PV PE on PV
/dev/dsk/c1t6d0 287 287
/dev/dsk/c2t6d0 287 287
Darrel
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-26-2006 09:44 AM
05-26-2006 09:44 AM
Re: "LogicalExtentsNumber" is not bigger than current setting
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-26-2006 10:10 AM
05-26-2006 10:10 AM
Re: "LogicalExtentsNumber" is not bigger than current setting
I've found the problem.
We're using a script to extend the Filesystem, this is for all Unix flavours.
There seems to be an error in the script.
When I extend the FS manually everything goes OKE.
So it's the script that's doing a wrong calculation.
Thanks for your quick reply and help.
Regards
Darrel Louis