HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
 - >
 - Servers and Operating Systems
 - >
 - Operating Systems
 - >
 - Operating System - HP-UX
 - >
 - RAID1 for OS, RAID5 for the rest? Or, RAID5 for a...
 
Operating System - HP-UX
        1840136
        Members
    
    
        1960
        Online
    
    
        110161
        Solutions
    
Forums
        Categories
Company
Local Language
                
                  
                  back
                
        
                
        
                
        
                
        
        
        
                
        
                
        
        
        
                
        
              
              Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
 - Entry Storage Systems
 - Legacy
 - Midrange and Enterprise Storage
 - Storage Networking
 - HPE Nimble Storage
 
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
                
                  
                  back
                
            
                
            
                
            
                
            
                
            
                
            
                
            
                
            
                
            
                
            
                
            
                
            
                
            
                
            
                
            
                
            
                
            
            
                
            
                
            
                
            
                
            
            
                
            
                
            
            
                
            
                
              
            Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
 - Appliance Servers
 - Alpha Servers
 - BackOffice Products
 - Internet Products
 - HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
 - Networking
 - Netservers
 - Secure OS Software for Linux
 - Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
 - Windows Server 2003
 - Operating System - Tru64 Unix
 - ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
 - Linux-Based Community / Regional
 - Microsoft System Center Integration
 
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
        Information
        Community
Resources
Community Language
        Language
        Forums
Blogs
	
		
			
            
                
            Go to solution
        
            
		
		
			
            	
	
		
        
		
	
	
		Topic Options
			
				
					
	
			
		
	- Subscribe to RSS Feed
 - Mark Topic as New
 - Mark Topic as Read
 - Float this Topic for Current User
 - Bookmark
 - Subscribe
 - Printer Friendly Page
 
- Mark as New
 - Bookmark
 - Subscribe
 - Mute
 - Subscribe to RSS Feed
 - Permalink
 - Report Inappropriate Content
 
12-07-2007 02:56 PM
12-07-2007 02:56 PM
			
				
					
					
						I'm configuring a new rx6600 as an Oracle DB server with 16 internal drives using the P400 HP Smart Array RAID controller.  My first thought is to create two RAID sets: use the first 2 drives and mirror them with RAID1 and use this for /vg00.  Then I'd configure the other 14 drives into a big RAID5 with a couple of spares and put everything else on that.
However, since I'm going through the same RAID controller would it actually be better to just build one big RAID5 using all 16 disks and put everything, including /vg00 on that?
Any input would be appreciated.
Mark
	
			
				
		
			
			
			
			
			
			
		
		
		
	
	
	
However, since I'm going through the same RAID controller would it actually be better to just build one big RAID5 using all 16 disks and put everything, including /vg00 on that?
Any input would be appreciated.
Mark
Solved! Go to Solution.
		3 REPLIES 3
	
	            
            
		
		
			
            
                - Mark as New
 - Bookmark
 - Subscribe
 - Mute
 - Subscribe to RSS Feed
 - Permalink
 - Report Inappropriate Content
 
12-07-2007 09:44 PM
12-07-2007 09:44 PM
Solution
			
				
					
					
						hi Mark!
This would have been my preferences:
1. Define RAID1 using sufficient disks that would cater for the OS and the area where i would be installing the Oracle software.
2. use the rest for defining my ASM area that would be used for my Oracle Database.
As you must already know ASM is just like raid 10 in effect -- done at the extent level of database segments instead of some
os stripe size.
This is the most simple and clean setup i can think of.
Beware however about performance - with one RAID controller... You only can compare you previous system performance and what you are looking forward to.
If you need any further assistance, please do let us know.
Good luck!
kind regards
yogeeraj
					
				
			
			
				
		
		
	
	
	
This would have been my preferences:
1. Define RAID1 using sufficient disks that would cater for the OS and the area where i would be installing the Oracle software.
2. use the rest for defining my ASM area that would be used for my Oracle Database.
As you must already know ASM is just like raid 10 in effect -- done at the extent level of database segments instead of some
os stripe size.
This is the most simple and clean setup i can think of.
Beware however about performance - with one RAID controller... You only can compare you previous system performance and what you are looking forward to.
If you need any further assistance, please do let us know.
Good luck!
kind regards
yogeeraj
	No person was ever honoured for what he received. Honour has been the reward for what he gave (clavin coolidge)
			
			
				
			
			
			
			
			
			
		- Mark as New
 - Bookmark
 - Subscribe
 - Mute
 - Subscribe to RSS Feed
 - Permalink
 - Report Inappropriate Content
 
12-07-2007 09:44 PM
12-07-2007 09:44 PM
			
				
					
						
							Re: RAID1 for OS, RAID5 for the rest?  Or, RAID5 for all?
						
					
					
				
			
		
	
			
	
	
	
	
	
			
				
					
					
						hi Mark!
This would have been my preferences:
1. Define RAID1 using sufficient disks that would cater for the OS and the area where i would be installing the Oracle software.
2. use the rest for defining my ASM area that would be used for my Oracle Database.
As you must already know - ASM is just like raid 10 in effect -- done at the extent level of database segments instead of some
os stripe size.
This is the most simple and clean setup i can think of.
Beware however about performance - with one RAID controller... You only can compare you previous system performance and what you are looking forward to.
If you need any further assistance, please do let us know.
Good luck!
kind regards
yogeeraj
					
				
			
			
				
		
		
	
	
	
This would have been my preferences:
1. Define RAID1 using sufficient disks that would cater for the OS and the area where i would be installing the Oracle software.
2. use the rest for defining my ASM area that would be used for my Oracle Database.
As you must already know - ASM is just like raid 10 in effect -- done at the extent level of database segments instead of some
os stripe size.
This is the most simple and clean setup i can think of.
Beware however about performance - with one RAID controller... You only can compare you previous system performance and what you are looking forward to.
If you need any further assistance, please do let us know.
Good luck!
kind regards
yogeeraj
	No person was ever honoured for what he received. Honour has been the reward for what he gave (clavin coolidge)
			
			
				
			
			
			
			
			
			
		- Mark as New
 - Bookmark
 - Subscribe
 - Mute
 - Subscribe to RSS Feed
 - Permalink
 - Report Inappropriate Content
 
12-09-2007 10:45 AM
12-09-2007 10:45 AM
			
				
					
						
							Re: RAID1 for OS, RAID5 for the rest?  Or, RAID5 for all?
						
					
					
				
			
		
	
			
	
	
	
	
	
			
				
					
					
						Hi
Actually the thing is that, it is recommended to install OS in RAID 1.
Compare to RAID 1, 5 RAID 0 is more faster.
For other application installations you can use RAID 5.
But if you want faster speed for bettr performance, better use RAID10
		
		
	
	
	
Actually the thing is that, it is recommended to install OS in RAID 1.
Compare to RAID 1, 5 RAID 0 is more faster.
For other application installations you can use RAID 5.
But if you want faster speed for bettr performance, better use RAID10
	a warrior never quits
			
			
				
			
			
			
			
			
			
		The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
		
	
	
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP