HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: Reducing FS with OJFS
Operating System - HP-UX
1827286
Members
1688
Online
109717
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-13-2000 05:19 AM
11-13-2000 05:19 AM
Hi,
ive heard OnlineJFS 3.3 will allow you to reduce a mounted filesystem by moving any data (used inodes) out of the way - which previous versions of OJFS would not do. Is this the case ?
ive heard OnlineJFS 3.3 will allow you to reduce a mounted filesystem by moving any data (used inodes) out of the way - which previous versions of OJFS would not do. Is this the case ?
Solved! Go to Solution.
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-13-2000 05:24 AM
11-13-2000 05:24 AM
Solution
Hi:
Yes, from document #JFS0007:
The new version 4 disk layout supported by OnlineJFS 3.3 allows successful online file system reduction.
In previous JFS releases, file system reduction failed when there was file system data in the area to be reduced.
With version 4 disk layout, JFS tries to move data from the area to be reduced to another part of the file system.
If JFS successfully relocates the data, the reduction takes place. If JFS cannot move the data, the reduction fails.
...JRF...
Yes, from document #JFS0007:
The new version 4 disk layout supported by OnlineJFS 3.3 allows successful online file system reduction.
In previous JFS releases, file system reduction failed when there was file system data in the area to be reduced.
With version 4 disk layout, JFS tries to move data from the area to be reduced to another part of the file system.
If JFS successfully relocates the data, the reduction takes place. If JFS cannot move the data, the reduction fails.
...JRF...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-13-2000 05:27 AM
11-13-2000 05:27 AM
Re: Reducing FS with OJFS
In a version 3 or above disk layout (JFS) if there are files in use on the sectory you wish to reduce then OJFS will attempt to relocate them to the filesystem space which is not being reduced.
Ive used this, it seems to work most of the time. Sometimes if your trying to reduce your filesystem too far to the used space total (eg. 1Gb FS, only 200Mb used, sometimes you cant reduce right down to 200Mb - may need to go to 250Mb or so) or if you have lots and lots of files on the filesystem you dont seem to be able to reduce too far also, even running a drfrag (fsadm -e). So its not guaranteed to reduce, but its a lot better than the old type 2 disk layout which couldnt be reduced at all if there was a file on the part of the filesystem you wanted to reduce.
Ive used this, it seems to work most of the time. Sometimes if your trying to reduce your filesystem too far to the used space total (eg. 1Gb FS, only 200Mb used, sometimes you cant reduce right down to 200Mb - may need to go to 250Mb or so) or if you have lots and lots of files on the filesystem you dont seem to be able to reduce too far also, even running a drfrag (fsadm -e). So its not guaranteed to reduce, but its a lot better than the old type 2 disk layout which couldnt be reduced at all if there was a file on the part of the filesystem you wanted to reduce.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Support
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP