- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- remote backup
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-29-2004 08:47 PM
12-29-2004 08:47 PM
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-29-2004 09:04 PM
12-29-2004 09:04 PM
Re: remote backup
hostB# tar cvf - / | remsh hostA dd of=/dev/rmt/0m
(You have to run tar on hostB and have remsh working.)
If you had used fbackup it would have supported remote tape devices.
Regards,
Trond
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-29-2004 09:31 PM
12-29-2004 09:31 PM
Re: remote backup
You can with the fbackup command.
See on the manpage.
For example:
backup to remote machine "hostA" which has a tape drive at /dev/rmt/0m)
# fbackup -f hostA:/dev/rmt/0m -v -i /tmp/test
Of course, you have to make sure that the name resolution between both servers and in .rhosts file.
Let's see on this link:
http://forums1.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=352809
Best and regard,
***HAPPY NEW YEAR***
HoangChiCong
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-29-2004 09:56 PM
12-29-2004 09:56 PM
SolutionOn hostB you export file system you want to backup. On hostA you mount it on.
This is the guide you need:
http://docs.hp.com/en/B2355-90685/index.html
For the first time. you should do by using SAM.
I did like this many time and all were successful.
TIENNA
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-29-2004 10:13 PM
12-29-2004 10:13 PM
Re: remote backup
The easy way to do this is with SAM from hostB:
#SAM -> Backup and Recovery -> Interactive Backup and Recovery -> Action -> Use Remote Backup Device -> Back Up Files Interactively... -> Specify Remote Backup Device... -> (Here you must enter the name of the remote server and the device file: /dev/rmt/0m).
But this will use fbackup command, not tar...
Best Regards,
Eric Antunes
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-29-2004 10:21 PM
12-29-2004 10:21 PM
Re: remote backup
NFS mount the files to be backed up from hostB on host A
tar cvf
should do
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-30-2004 05:29 AM
12-30-2004 05:29 AM
Re: remote backup
For a possible speed up boost - you can try
tar cvf - /sourcedir | compress | remsh hostA "uncompress | dd of=/dev/rmt/0m"
At times, this can be a faster variant of the same idea. Depends on what you're backing up and what the bottlenecks to the transaction are.