- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Removing special files
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-27-2002 07:48 AM
09-27-2002 07:48 AM
These special files were unwanted as I am using secure manager on a XP frame to limit access LUN access on HBA WWWN base.
End result achieved is now that "xpinfo" only reports LUNs that server can really use.
But
1) "ioscan -fC disk" still reports LUNs as CLAIMED. Why ?
At least, it should show a "NO_HARDWARE" status
Question : Without rebooting, what is the solution so that "ioscan" reflects real situation i.e it should not report these LUNS at all anymore.
What would you recommend ?
Thank you.
Hugues.
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-27-2002 07:54 AM
09-27-2002 07:54 AM
SolutionI do not think that you have the option of stopping these files being rediscovered. As you may already know, the XP512 produces these cXtYd0 files as possible controllers for future disks presented within their LUN Range.
If you really really want to hide these for whatever reason, do some LUN Masking at your Switch level (you may need an upgraded Firmware Version and additional License to do this on brocades).
Question: How much damage do these null disks REALLY do to your system?
Share and Enjoy, Ian
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-27-2002 10:26 AM
09-27-2002 10:26 AM
Re: Removing special files
It's not a big deal except that it is unsual do look at ioscan output and to see that some of the disks are CLAIMED but not really true disk space available for storage.
Instead, I have to rely on "xpinfo -m" output to know which LUN is accessible or not to a host.
What I find disturbing is that a standard unix sys admin (me for instance), not taking attention that host is attached to a XP, might conclude that disks are missing or a fc is dead.
Also,I would like to have your comments on the following :
A side effect of such cXtYd0 special files is that comparing "xpinfo -i" output from 2 distinct SAN attached HP hosts show relevant CU:LDEV as if they were accessible by both nodes.
I have to rely on "xpinfo -m" to figure out that as a matter of fact it is a 0 size LUN from one of the node perspective i.e that host can not use it.
To summarize :
1) "ioscan" on both nodes show disk device "CLAIMED" but it is not really disk space server can use.
2) it is only with the help of both "xpinfo -i" and "xpinfo -m" that I can really be sure that a given CU:LDEV is not potentially shared.
Am i missing something ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-27-2002 12:08 PM
09-27-2002 12:08 PM
Re: Removing special files
disk 43 1/4/0/0.8.0.17.0.4.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HP DISK-SUBSYSTEM
/dev/dsk/c7t4d0 /dev/rdsk/c7t4d0
disk 56 1/4/0/0.8.0.17.0.4.1 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HP OPEN-E
/dev/dsk/c7t4d1 /dev/rdsk/c7t4d1
disk 44 1/4/0/0.8.0.17.0.5.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HP DISK-SUBSYSTEM
/dev/dsk/c7t5d0 /dev/rdsk/c7t5d0
If they were not there, certain versions of HP-UX would not recognize a disk if a LUN was assigned non-sequentially (i.e. cXt4d2 assigned and cXt4d1 was not assigned to the host.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-27-2002 02:06 PM
09-27-2002 02:06 PM
Re: Removing special files
Manoj Srivastava