GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: Resource intensive processes
Operating System - HP-UX
1849142
Members
4890
Online
104041
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-02-2002 08:25 PM
01-02-2002 08:25 PM
Resource intensive processes
Hi,
I have noticed that several, about 14, processes that monitor time clocks are hogging the CPUs of late.
I have reniced the processes which has eased the situation/load on the system somewhat but these reniced processes are still taking more than their fair share of the CPUs, see attached. If I run the same app/process on my backup server same version of hpux 11.00 and Universe 9.6 the process cpu percent drops to 2.5% instead of the 9% for each process on the main server. The majority, 95%, of the wait state on the backup server for the process is sleep whereas on the main its reported as other.
A trace of the process produces the following.
****
sigprocmask(0x400c87e0, NULL, 0x400c880c) . [running]
sigprocmask(0x400c87e0, NULL, 0x400c880c) . = 0
select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0x7f7e2a28) . = 0
sigsetstatemask(NULL, NULL, 119675188) . = 0
time(0x7f7e23a4) .. = 1006724853
time(NULL) .. = 1006724853
sigprocmask(0x400c87e0, NULL, 0x400c880c) . = 0
sigprocmask(0x40064100, NULL, 0x4006412c) . = 0
read(30, 0x40128df8, 8192) .. = 0
sigsetstatemask(NULL, NULL, 119675188) . = 0
time(0x7f7e23a4) .. = 1006724853
time(NULL) .. = 1006724853
time(0x7f7e23a4) .. = 1006724853
time(NULL) .. = 1006724853
sigprocmask(0x400d0370, NULL, 0x400d039c) . = 0
select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0x7f7e2a28) . = 0
sigsetstatemask(NULL, NULL, 119675188) . = 0
****
The only changes made recently to the main server which hasn't been made to the backup server was the installation of the patches that come with the bundle QPK1100 sept 2001.
A lot of patches were installed through neccessity.
Any suggestions assistance would be appreciated
Thanks in advance.
Paul.
I have noticed that several, about 14, processes that monitor time clocks are hogging the CPUs of late.
I have reniced the processes which has eased the situation/load on the system somewhat but these reniced processes are still taking more than their fair share of the CPUs, see attached. If I run the same app/process on my backup server same version of hpux 11.00 and Universe 9.6 the process cpu percent drops to 2.5% instead of the 9% for each process on the main server. The majority, 95%, of the wait state on the backup server for the process is sleep whereas on the main its reported as other.
A trace of the process produces the following.
****
sigprocmask(0x400c87e0, NULL, 0x400c880c) . [running]
sigprocmask(0x400c87e0, NULL, 0x400c880c) . = 0
select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0x7f7e2a28) . = 0
sigsetstatemask(NULL, NULL, 119675188) . = 0
time(0x7f7e23a4) .. = 1006724853
time(NULL) .. = 1006724853
sigprocmask(0x400c87e0, NULL, 0x400c880c) . = 0
sigprocmask(0x40064100, NULL, 0x4006412c) . = 0
read(30, 0x40128df8, 8192) .. = 0
sigsetstatemask(NULL, NULL, 119675188) . = 0
time(0x7f7e23a4) .. = 1006724853
time(NULL) .. = 1006724853
time(0x7f7e23a4) .. = 1006724853
time(NULL) .. = 1006724853
sigprocmask(0x400d0370, NULL, 0x400d039c) . = 0
select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0x7f7e2a28) . = 0
sigsetstatemask(NULL, NULL, 119675188) . = 0
****
The only changes made recently to the main server which hasn't been made to the backup server was the installation of the patches that come with the bundle QPK1100 sept 2001.
A lot of patches were installed through neccessity.
Any suggestions assistance would be appreciated
Thanks in advance.
Paul.
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-02-2002 09:44 PM
01-02-2002 09:44 PM
Re: Resource intensive processes
Hi Paul,
I don't know if your processes qualify for the following, but apparently there have been some problems with QPK1100 sept 2001 that are solved by PHSS_25787.
You might to take a look at http://forums.itrc.hp.com/cm/QuestionAnswer/1,,0xf3d8f715edc6d5118ff10090279cd0f9,00.html
Again, I don't know if your processes qualify ... but it might be worth a try.
Regards,
Tom Geudens
I don't know if your processes qualify for the following, but apparently there have been some problems with QPK1100 sept 2001 that are solved by PHSS_25787.
You might to take a look at http://forums.itrc.hp.com/cm/QuestionAnswer/1,,0xf3d8f715edc6d5118ff10090279cd0f9,00.html
Again, I don't know if your processes qualify ... but it might be worth a try.
Regards,
Tom Geudens
A life ? Cool ! Where can I download one of those from ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-03-2002 12:32 AM
01-03-2002 12:32 AM
Re: Resource intensive processes
Hi Paul
These are universe phantoms written and instigated by your devel team, I would have a word with them to :-
1. Give the phantom a better name ie. phantom-clean-up.
2. Find out how many phantoms should be running.
3. Are they doing large selects?
4. Find out what each phantom does and why.
5. Query as to why the are running so many phantoms.
Do you have tusc installed if not it is worth getting as it can be run against a PID to find out what it is doing.
Universe phantoms unless written and tested very carefully can be processor/system gready, they can either loop around and continue doing a job or have an inbuild delay.
PS I am running Universe 9.4.1.1.I on three servers.
These are universe phantoms written and instigated by your devel team, I would have a word with them to :-
1. Give the phantom a better name ie. phantom-clean-up.
2. Find out how many phantoms should be running.
3. Are they doing large selects?
4. Find out what each phantom does and why.
5. Query as to why the are running so many phantoms.
Do you have tusc installed if not it is worth getting as it can be run against a PID to find out what it is doing.
Universe phantoms unless written and tested very carefully can be processor/system gready, they can either loop around and continue doing a job or have an inbuild delay.
PS I am running Universe 9.4.1.1.I on three servers.
If you can spell SysAdmin then you is one - anon
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2026 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP