- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: rexec limitations?
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-08-2002 02:00 PM
05-08-2002 02:00 PM
Error being received is 'no available ptys'.
As soon as we reach 176 npty's in use (according to gpm) it will not allow any other additional rexec logins. If someone gets out, then someone else is able to log in, but there seems to be a limitation to the number that are allowed (?) Telnet, remsh, and rlogins are fine, only a problem with rexec (which I must use because of prompts rec'd when users log in). We are using Hummingbird's Exceed, but I have verified that it is also a problem just running rexec from the command line, so I've ruled out a software problem.
My kernal params: npty, nstrpty, and nstrtel are all set to 400 and device files appear to be in order. Like I stated gpm states that only 176 pty's out of 400 available are in use.
Is there some other configuration setting somewhere that I need to increase to allow more rexec logins to this system??
Any help is appreciated!
Michell
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-08-2002 02:05 PM
05-08-2002 02:05 PM
Re: rexec limitations?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-08-2002 02:16 PM
05-08-2002 02:16 PM
Re: rexec limitations?
If it were nproc/nfile I believe I'd see processes failing (probably alot of them)?? Besides nproc on this system is set to 3461 and when I looked today I was running at around 2400. My nfile param is set at 53973.
I should clarify, we have always had this many users (around 250 concurrently) logging into this system, however over the past week we have been slowly converting them all over from Reflections (using telnet) to Exceed (using rexec), which is why we have just started seeing this problem.
Thank you for the suggestion - any other thoughts out there??
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-08-2002 02:55 PM
05-08-2002 02:55 PM
Re: rexec limitations?
look under /dev/pts. The files that do not begin with a 't' are used by rlogin and rexec.
to create 400 then use:
insf -e -d pts -n 400
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-08-2002 03:47 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-08-2002 03:47 PM
05-08-2002 03:47 PM
Re: rexec limitations?
# ls -l /dev/pty |wc -l
# ls -l /dev/ptym | wc -l
==> If you got 61 then it's the default and you need to bump it up.
First in SAM, increase "npty". Depending on how many connection you need. I would say 512 to start off. After the system reboots with the new kernel, build the device files.
# insf -d ptys -n 512
# insf -d ptym -n 512
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-09-2002 06:08 AM
05-09-2002 06:08 AM
Re: rexec limitations?
Trevor - I tried your suggestion and recreated device files, however I still have the problem.
After that, I also tried a suggestion from HP to run a straight 'insf -e', this did not work either...
S.K. - I ran your cmds as well and found that I have 401 in /dev/pty and 801 in /dev/pts. Should be plenty (?)
Help????