HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Routing Table filling up
Operating System - HP-UX
1834391
Members
1813
Online
110066
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-01-2001 01:38 AM
02-01-2001 01:38 AM
Unable to access the HP -10.20 Server from remote site with other subnet.R main subnet is 10.200.100 and other subnet are 102-104.Situation gets worse as time goes by.More users lose their connection.
Did netstat -r.Found that there were 5 pages of print out.
removed all entries with route -f and re-entered the defalut gateway.
Everything starts fine.But after few minutes problem persists.
Few more questions :
1)Why is the router table filling up
2)And also the default gateway resets every system -re-boot.We have to manually enter it after every system re-boot.
Did netstat -r.Found that there were 5 pages of print out.
removed all entries with route -f and re-entered the defalut gateway.
Everything starts fine.But after few minutes problem persists.
Few more questions :
1)Why is the router table filling up
2)And also the default gateway resets every system -re-boot.We have to manually enter it after every system re-boot.
Solved! Go to Solution.
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-01-2001 04:08 AM
02-01-2001 04:08 AM
Solution
Are the flags for the routes UGHD? If so, this is coming from a router. This is an ICMP redirect, sent by a router to the sender of an IP datagram when the datagram should have been sent to a different router.
You can turn this off at the router, run a cron job to flush the routing tables or turn off defrag with nettune.
As to your default gateway, ensure you only have one copy of netconf under /etc/rc.config.d (no backups, prev, or otherwise) and that you have the default route set up correctly with
ROUTE_DESTINATION[0]=default
ROUTE_GATEWAY[0]=IP ADDRESS
ROUTE_COUNT[0]=1
You can turn this off at the router, run a cron job to flush the routing tables or turn off defrag with nettune.
As to your default gateway, ensure you only have one copy of netconf under /etc/rc.config.d (no backups, prev, or otherwise) and that you have the default route set up correctly with
ROUTE_DESTINATION[0]=default
ROUTE_GATEWAY[0]=IP ADDRESS
ROUTE_COUNT[0]=1
http://www.mindspring.com/~bkherren/dobes/index.htm
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-01-2001 04:10 AM
02-01-2001 04:10 AM
Re: Routing Table filling up
Sorry forgot to add how to turn off defrag
During the connection establishment we try to figure out which MTU (Maximum Transmission Unit) we should use to avoid fragmentation on our way to the destination.
When enabled(1), all TCP datagrams will be transmitted with the DF bit set and this will start the PMTU Discovery process. When disabled(0), the DF bit is not set.
Default Values:
This value can only be turned on or off.
ON:1
OFF: 0
Default: 1
Usable Commands:
Get the actual status of tcp_pmtu:
nettune -l tcp_pmtu
Turn off tcp_pmtu:
nettune -s tcp_pmtu 0
This will not survive a reboot, so you will have to place it in a startup script.
Berlene
During the connection establishment we try to figure out which MTU (Maximum Transmission Unit) we should use to avoid fragmentation on our way to the destination.
When enabled(1), all TCP datagrams will be transmitted with the DF bit set and this will start the PMTU Discovery process. When disabled(0), the DF bit is not set.
Default Values:
This value can only be turned on or off.
ON:1
OFF: 0
Default: 1
Usable Commands:
Get the actual status of tcp_pmtu:
nettune -l tcp_pmtu
Turn off tcp_pmtu:
nettune -s tcp_pmtu 0
This will not survive a reboot, so you will have to place it in a startup script.
Berlene
http://www.mindspring.com/~bkherren/dobes/index.htm
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-01-2001 10:29 AM
02-01-2001 10:29 AM
Re: Routing Table filling up
Even five pages of route entries should not leave an HP-UX 10.20 system unreachable. The routing table lookups for HP-UX are reasonably efficient. As time goes by, are you seeing more and more SYStem time in Glance? If not, I would guess that the routes are not a root cause - perhaps a symptom, but not a root cause.
Also, if your default route is pointed at a "real" router rather than your own IP addres, dynamically added routes with a zero reference count should be culled every arp_killcomplete seconds.
Certainly disabling PathMTU Discovery will prevent the addition of Dynamic routes based on PMTU. However, that you were getting such routes means your system is talking to other systems along paths with MTU's smaller than the system's own. It would be interesting to note what the PMTU value is for an "active" route entry (one with a non-zero reference count).
When you disable PMTU, TCP will cease negotiating a Maximum Segment Size (MSS) based on the local MTU and will instead fall-back on a smaller default value of 536 bytes. Depending on your workload, this may result in more TCP segments and higher CPU overhead. Also, if the PathMTU's from above were less than 576, the IP datagrams containing the TCP segments will start to be fragmented along the way. This is not a problem unless you have packet loss. If one fragment of a datgram is lost, the entire datagram becomes useless, and TCP will have to retransmit the entire segment.
Also, if your default route is pointed at a "real" router rather than your own IP addres, dynamically added routes with a zero reference count should be culled every arp_killcomplete seconds.
Certainly disabling PathMTU Discovery will prevent the addition of Dynamic routes based on PMTU. However, that you were getting such routes means your system is talking to other systems along paths with MTU's smaller than the system's own. It would be interesting to note what the PMTU value is for an "active" route entry (one with a non-zero reference count).
When you disable PMTU, TCP will cease negotiating a Maximum Segment Size (MSS) based on the local MTU and will instead fall-back on a smaller default value of 536 bytes. Depending on your workload, this may result in more TCP segments and higher CPU overhead. Also, if the PathMTU's from above were less than 576, the IP datagrams containing the TCP segments will start to be fragmented along the way. This is not a problem unless you have packet loss. If one fragment of a datgram is lost, the entire datagram becomes useless, and TCP will have to retransmit the entire segment.
there is no rest for the wicked yet the virtuous have no pillows
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP