- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- secunia reported HP-UX patches that were not highl...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-13-2008 01:27 AM
06-13-2008 01:27 AM
Re: secunia reported HP-UX patches that were not highlighted when using swainv
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-13-2008 01:35 AM
06-13-2008 01:35 AM
Re: secunia reported HP-UX patches that were not highlighted when using swainv
When you put the patches into a bundle they "disappear". I assume the thought behind this is if you download a patch bundle with 100s of patches, they don't want to bother you with each individual name.
If you want to drill down to get the details you can use "-l product", etc.
Hmm, when I use "swlist -l patch" on that "depot" file, I do see the patches, down to the fileset level.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-13-2008 01:43 AM
06-13-2008 01:43 AM
Re: secunia reported HP-UX patches that were not highlighted when using swainv
Ah, you are on 11.11 and PHCO_37291 and PHNE_36193 were for 11.23.
PHCO_37290 is the 11.11 equivalent for PHCO_37291. The other doesn't have one.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-16-2008 12:07 AM
06-16-2008 12:07 AM
Re: secunia reported HP-UX patches that were not highlighted when using swainv
Kindly asap. Thank you.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-16-2008 04:13 AM
06-16-2008 04:13 AM
Re: secunia reported HP-UX patches that were not highlighted when using swainv
This is not a patch.
The opinion of others on this forum is to not upgrade but cold load to 11.23.
But before you attempt this, you should make sure your existing hardware and cards will support 11.23.
There are lots of threads about moving to 11.23. You can search for more.
http://forums.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=1209055
http://forums.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=1206413
http://forums.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=1202554
http://forums.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=1197568
http://forums.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=1196725
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-16-2008 05:02 PM
06-16-2008 05:02 PM
Re: secunia reported HP-UX patches that were not highlighted when using swainv
What happened was some servers in our staging environment have HP UX B.11.11 and some have HP UX B.11.23. Would you recommend to upgrade to all HP UX B.11.23?
The same apply to our production environment. That's why I was wondering whether we should upgrade all to HP UX B.11.23 so that every OS is at the same level.
For your necessary advice pls.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-16-2008 05:35 PM
06-16-2008 05:35 PM
Re: secunia reported HP-UX patches that were not highlighted when using swainv
This is entirely up to you.
Obviously Mark Hurd wants you to go all the way to 11.31 and Integrity. :-)
>That's why I was wondering whether we should upgrade all to HP UX B.11.23 so that every OS is at the same level.
Do you have applications that don't run on 11.23?
If you are not limited by software issues and your machines/cards can all support 11.23, going to one OS version would be easier to support.
Of course if you are a software developer (ISV), you may need a 11.11 system to do development and testing.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-16-2008 07:37 PM
06-16-2008 07:37 PM
Re: secunia reported HP-UX patches that were not highlighted when using swainv
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-16-2008 07:43 PM
06-16-2008 07:43 PM
Re: secunia reported HP-UX patches that were not highlighted when using swainv
If you have extra machines, you could try to cold install to that machine to see what issues you have.
Otherwise you would need a full backup and an Ignite backup so you can quickly go back.
But the most important thing is planning.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-16-2008 10:22 PM
06-16-2008 10:22 PM
Re: secunia reported HP-UX patches that were not highlighted when using swainv
1) PHNE_36193 will work only on HP UX B.11.23. Is there such a patch for HP UX B.11.11? If yes, where to download the patch?Pls give full details so that I just need to click and download the patch?
2) AM I correct to say that PHCO_37291 will fix 9) on HP UX B.11.23 and PHCO_37290 will do the same on HP UX B.11.11? If yes, pls indicate full details where to download PHCO_37290. I have PHCO_37291.
3) Patch PHSS_37703 will fix no. 10 on both OS?
4) Can anybody tell me whether there are existing patches for 3) - 8) ? and whether they are compatible on both OS? 6) and 8) are more urgent. Thank you.
A million thankssssss......
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-16-2008 10:44 PM
06-16-2008 10:44 PM
Re: secunia reported HP-UX patches that were not highlighted when using swainv
There is no obvious equivalent ftp patch:
http://www.itrc.hp.com/service/patch/patchDetail.do?patchid=PHNE_36193#Equivalent%20Patches:
2) AM I correct to say that PHCO_37291 will fix 9) on HP UX B.11.23 and PHCO_37290 will do the same on HP UX B.11.11?
That's what equivalence means.
>pls indicate full details where to download PHCO_37290. I have PHCO_37291.
The same as the others, the Patch database:
http://www.itrc.hp.com/service/patch/mainPage.do
http://www.itrc.hp.com/service/patch/patchDetail.do?patchid=PHCO_37290
>3) Patch PHSS_37703 will fix #10 on both OS?
You need PHSS_37702 for 11.11.
>4) Can anybody tell me whether there are existing patches for 3) - 8)? and whether they are compatible on both OS?
I would suggest you look at HP's security bulletin link I gave above. Or go back to secunia's web site. All this info should be there. Secunia gives info by OS version.
See Ivan's reply to your other thread:
http://forums.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=1239459
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-16-2008 11:31 PM
06-16-2008 11:31 PM
Re: secunia reported HP-UX patches that were not highlighted when using swainv
need your expertise,thanks.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-16-2008 11:39 PM
06-16-2008 11:39 PM
Re: secunia reported HP-UX patches that were not highlighted when using swainv
It may depend on which is easier to push, which is faster or ftp may not be allowed in your org.
>i can save the file as .txt file. How come they do not come up as a zip file?
You can get them as zip, if you put more than one patch in your shopping cart.
>I am wondering whether its correct in downloading the file as a txt file.
A possible problem would be if you didn't use binary mode to transfer from your PC to HP-UX. The contents of an individual patch is a shar(1) file, with patch-ID.text and patch-ID.depot.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-17-2008 12:29 AM
06-17-2008 12:29 AM
Re: secunia reported HP-UX patches that were not highlighted when using swainv
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-17-2008 06:08 AM
06-17-2008 06:08 AM
Re: secunia reported HP-UX patches that were not highlighted when using swainv
The simplest way is to not add the .txt suffix. Then when it gets to the HP-UX system, you can just follow what the README says.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-17-2008 06:22 AM
06-17-2008 06:22 AM
Re: secunia reported HP-UX patches that were not highlighted when using swainv
Within the "download patches" window, *right* click on the "download via http" button and select "save target as ...".
Now select "save as type" to all files.
But the better solution:
click on
"+ Expand to view additional download options"
and select
gzip package
or
tar package
format.
Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.
__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!
If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-17-2008 07:45 PM
06-17-2008 07:45 PM
Re: secunia reported HP-UX patches that were not highlighted when using swainv
I am deploying T1471AA_A.05.00.024_HP-UX_B.11.11_32_64.depot in my spare server running on HP UX B.11.11 to solve 5), after extracting the file, I saw 2 folders, catalog and Secure_Shell, how to proceed with the installation?
Thanks.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-17-2008 09:09 PM
06-17-2008 09:09 PM
Re: secunia reported HP-UX patches that were not highlighted when using swainv
You should not have "extracting the file". If you see "catalog", you have gone too far.
You should simply use:
swinstall -s $PWD/T1471AA_A.05.00.024_HP-UX_B.11.11_32_64.depot
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-17-2008 09:29 PM
06-17-2008 09:29 PM
Re: secunia reported HP-UX patches that were not highlighted when using swainv
Thanks.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-17-2008 10:09 PM
06-17-2008 10:09 PM
Re: secunia reported HP-UX patches that were not highlighted when using swainv
I don't see it? Why do you think it exists?
Staring here:
http://docs.hp.com/en/B1031-90062/ch01s03.html
It talks about v7 for Red Hat.
For HP-UX, I only see V6:
http://h20392.www2.hp.com/portal/swdepot/displayProductsList.do?category=ISS
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-17-2008 11:06 PM
06-17-2008 11:06 PM
Re: secunia reported HP-UX patches that were not highlighted when using swainv
When I do 'swlist|more', I see
PHNE_35351 1.0 cumulative ARPA Transport patch. However , when I do 'swlist -l patch|grep PHNE_35351', I See
# PHNE_35351 1.0 cumulative ARPA Transport patch
Is the patch installed on the server?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-17-2008 11:20 PM
06-17-2008 11:20 PM
Re: secunia reported HP-UX patches that were not highlighted when using swainv
It sure looks like it. Both commands show it's there.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-17-2008 11:50 PM
06-17-2008 11:50 PM
Re: secunia reported HP-UX patches that were not highlighted when using swainv
What is the difference when there is 'applied' at the end and '#' at the beginning?
I was thinking '#' is the same as comment,wrong?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-18-2008 09:10 AM
06-18-2008 09:10 AM
Re: secunia reported HP-UX patches that were not highlighted when using swainv
There are more details when you say "patch".
>What is the difference when there is 'applied' at the end and '#' at the beginning?
>I was thinking '#' is the same as comment, wrong?
Technically if a patch isn't applied or configured it may not be valid, so "-l patch" is giving more details. You could use the "-a patch_state" option to get more of them. It could also list that a patch is superseded or corrupt.
No, that "#" is just formatting it differently, something like indentation.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-18-2008 07:30 PM
06-18-2008 07:30 PM
Re: secunia reported HP-UX patches that were not highlighted when using swainv
I am trying to install PHSS_37702 on HP UX B.11.11. I got the following errors
* "nspdcqp3:/": The software dependencies for 3 products or
filesets cannot be resolved.
* "nspdcqp3:/": 1 bundles have the selected revision already
installed.
* "nspdcqp3:/": 1 bundles cannot be installed because none of
their filesets can be installed.
* Analysis and Execution succeeded.
Any resolution?