HPE GreenLake Administration
- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- sendmail 8.11.1
Operating System - HP-UX
1829880
Members
5746
Online
109993
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-14-2003 05:13 PM
08-14-2003 05:13 PM
sendmail 8.11.1
Hi, (op sys ux 11.00)
Have upgraded to sendmail 8.11.1. but appear still to be vulnerable to the remote buffer overflow problem. Have the following patches loaded: PHKL_18799 PHNE_17190 PHNE_24419 PHNE_26304 AND SMAIL-811. Am I still missing something?
Also, is there a way to disable the use of smrsh in sendmail?
Thanks, Maria.
Have upgraded to sendmail 8.11.1. but appear still to be vulnerable to the remote buffer overflow problem. Have the following patches loaded: PHKL_18799 PHNE_17190 PHNE_24419 PHNE_26304 AND SMAIL-811. Am I still missing something?
Also, is there a way to disable the use of smrsh in sendmail?
Thanks, Maria.
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-15-2003 06:09 AM
08-15-2003 06:09 AM
Re: sendmail 8.11.1
Unless you have very specific features enabled in sendmail, I think it's interesting that you consider changing your mail system to Postfix. It's absolutely safer than sendmail, understands sendmail's configuration files and is faster and lighter than sendmail.
The link for Postfix is http://www.postfix.org. Binaries for HP-UX and other information can be found at http://www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb/postfix.
HTH
Paulo Fessel
The link for Postfix is http://www.postfix.org. Binaries for HP-UX and other information can be found at http://www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb/postfix.
HTH
Paulo Fessel
L'employé propose, le boss dispose.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-15-2003 07:32 AM
08-15-2003 07:32 AM
Re: sendmail 8.11.1
Go here:
http://www.software.hp.com/ISS_products_list.html
And download security_patch_check and run it once a week or so. Be sure to always run it with the -r option to refresh the catalog.
mark
http://www.software.hp.com/ISS_products_list.html
And download security_patch_check and run it once a week or so. Be sure to always run it with the -r option to refresh the catalog.
mark
the future will be a lot like now, only later
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-15-2003 07:48 AM
08-15-2003 07:48 AM
Re: sendmail 8.11.1
SMRSH IN SENDMAIL
If Sendmail is using smrsh, then the only programs that can be executed are those under the /etc/smrsh/ directory. Perhaps the best solution to run the wrapper from the aliases file is to create a symbolic link from /etc/smrsh/wrapper to /usr/local/majordomo-1.94.5/wrapper. [root@kes smrsh]# ln -s /usr/local/majordomo-1.94.5/wrapper wrapper
A second solution is to actually move the wrapper into the /etc/smrsh/ directory. [root@kes smrsh]# mv /usr/local/majordomo-1.94.5/wrapper ./
If security is not a major concern, the secure shell can be disabled. One fairly crude method is simply to delete /usr/sbin/smrsh and copy or link /bin/sh in its place. [root@kes sbin]# rm -f smrsh
[root@kes sbin]# ln -s /bin/sh smrsh
A better (but more difficult) method is to edit sendmail.cf. Change the reference from /usr/sbin/smrsh Mprog, P=/usr/sbin/smrsh, F=lsDFMoqeu9, S=10/30, R=20/40, D=$z:/,
T=X-Unix,
A=sh -c $u
to /bin/sh Mprog, P=/bin/sh, F=lsDFMoqeu9, S=10/30, R=20/40, D=$z:/,
T=X-Unix,
A=sh -c $u
Advantage: This will prevent this class of vulnerability being
exploited on your system without requiring a new version of
sendmail(8) to be installed. Mailing to unauthorised programs
will no longer work.
Disadvantage: If a program is not authorised by smrsh, any attempt
to use it via mail will cause an error reply to be generated.
System administrators should check their aliases and all
.forward files for any configuration that mails to a program.
These configurations will generate an error reply on every
message mailed if that program is not authorised for use by smrsh.
If the .forward file contains something similar to:
\user, "| /usr/ucb/vacation user"
then mail will still be delivered to "user", but an error reply
(not the vacation message) will be returned to the sender if
vacation is not authorised for use by smrsh.
If Sendmail is using smrsh, then the only programs that can be executed are those under the /etc/smrsh/ directory. Perhaps the best solution to run the wrapper from the aliases file is to create a symbolic link from /etc/smrsh/wrapper to /usr/local/majordomo-1.94.5/wrapper. [root@kes smrsh]# ln -s /usr/local/majordomo-1.94.5/wrapper wrapper
A second solution is to actually move the wrapper into the /etc/smrsh/ directory. [root@kes smrsh]# mv /usr/local/majordomo-1.94.5/wrapper ./
If security is not a major concern, the secure shell can be disabled. One fairly crude method is simply to delete /usr/sbin/smrsh and copy or link /bin/sh in its place. [root@kes sbin]# rm -f smrsh
[root@kes sbin]# ln -s /bin/sh smrsh
A better (but more difficult) method is to edit sendmail.cf. Change the reference from /usr/sbin/smrsh Mprog, P=/usr/sbin/smrsh, F=lsDFMoqeu9, S=10/30, R=20/40, D=$z:/,
T=X-Unix,
A=sh -c $u
to /bin/sh Mprog, P=/bin/sh, F=lsDFMoqeu9, S=10/30, R=20/40, D=$z:/,
T=X-Unix,
A=sh -c $u
Advantage: This will prevent this class of vulnerability being
exploited on your system without requiring a new version of
sendmail(8) to be installed. Mailing to unauthorised programs
will no longer work.
Disadvantage: If a program is not authorised by smrsh, any attempt
to use it via mail will cause an error reply to be generated.
System administrators should check their aliases and all
.forward files for any configuration that mails to a program.
These configurations will generate an error reply on every
message mailed if that program is not authorised for use by smrsh.
If the .forward file contains something similar to:
\user, "| /usr/ucb/vacation user"
then mail will still be delivered to "user", but an error reply
(not the vacation message) will be returned to the sender if
vacation is not authorised for use by smrsh.
legionx
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
Company
Events and news
Customer resources
© Copyright 2025 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP