- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: SERVICE_NAME function in the Package Control s...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-27-2010 10:51 AM
07-27-2010 10:51 AM
SERVICE_NAME function in the Package Control script
Is this STILL a requirement for ServiceGuard 11.17,.18,.19 or is this one of the things they fixed in subsequent patches/releases of SG?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-27-2010 11:57 AM
07-27-2010 11:57 AM
Re: SERVICE_NAME function in the Package Control script
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-27-2010 11:41 PM
07-27-2010 11:41 PM
Re: SERVICE_NAME function in the Package Control script
Maybe, as I think Melvyn is suggesting, you were told that you need to have a service if you want the package to go down if your custom application fails. i.e. without using a service, if your custom application fails a cmviewcl -l package would show the package up because it would be up. If you define a service to monitor your application, if the application fails you can have a service to detect this which will fail the package. i.e. if your application fails, cmviewcl -l package would show the package down because it would have been brought down by the service.
Certainly, a service itself is never required to ensure cmviewcl -l package works. If it is then this is a defect which needs investigating!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-28-2010 12:14 AM
07-28-2010 12:14 AM
Re: SERVICE_NAME function in the Package Control script
Important: the service name must be the same in package definition and run control script
thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-28-2010 04:54 AM
07-28-2010 04:54 AM
Re: SERVICE_NAME function in the Package Control script
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-28-2010 11:40 PM
07-28-2010 11:40 PM