- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Some users' profile cannot access a said path...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-11-2001 09:33 PM
09-11-2001 09:33 PM
Some users' profile cannot access a said path...
This has caused a unique problem. When the user's profiles were changed to access the PATH of the new versions of Progress and MFG/PRO, most users were able to log on to the system and later in to MFG/PRO too, but some (abt. 40%) of the users were not able to log onto the MFG/PRO system. It gave an error of a perticular program not being seen in the said PATH(s). However, on investigation we found that the same program was accessible from other profiles that were working with the same PATH configuration.
Now, as a work-arround, we changed the uid of all the users to the uid of the user that was working and also the home directory permissions to that of the working user id, and found that all users were able to log on to UNIX with their own user ID and also to MFG/PRO without any problems. However, the default user id that appears on the MFG/PRO log in would show that of the working user ID.
PLEASE HELP as we are now facing a problem in the second location where we are going live on Ver. 9 of MFG/PRO.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-12-2001 10:01 AM
09-12-2001 10:01 AM
Re: Some users' profile cannot access a said path...
Here's a couple of things to think about.
My test shows that MFG/PRO sees all the users with the same numeric uid as the first one found in /etc/profile. I presume that's the working user you refer to. That's also pretty much now UNIX works. For example, ls -l will show the owner as the first loginid from /etc/passwd even if another loginid with the same uid created the file.
Did you verify all home directories and .profiles were owned by the correct loginid? Does the program file not seen by all users actually have the appropriate owner, group, and permissions to allow everyone to access it?
I suspect your issue is strictly a UNIX problem. We are running MGF/PRO 9.0 sp2 and Progress 8.3b without any issue of this kind.
Darrell
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-12-2001 12:37 PM - last edited on 06-28-2021 10:11 PM by Ramya_Heera
09-12-2001 12:37 PM - last edited on 06-28-2021 10:11 PM by Ramya_Heera
Re: Some users' profile cannot access a said path...
Hi Arun,
Make sure all of your app dirs are mode 755. A dir must have read and run set for a user (whether owner, group, or world) in order for said user to cd to or *through* that dir.
All the best,
Jim
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-12-2001 12:52 PM
09-12-2001 12:52 PM
Re: Some users' profile cannot access a said path...
This seems to be a Unix permission/ownership
related issue. Make sure the profile/startup
files of the problem users are correctly
configured. If it is PATH issue, make
sure the PATH is pointing to all the
required directories.
A simple but careful comparision of a working user configuration and a non-working one would
point out the problem. This does not
seem to be an application problem.
-raj