- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Storage issues
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-25-2005 02:49 AM
08-25-2005 02:49 AM
I have a L1000 Box with a 12H attached, recently i try to connect an aditional 12H to the same box and the server's performance go down.
Both 12H have an X and Y controller and two SCSI card each. I wonder this configuration is valid and if this kind of box can support it and where i can find docs about this issue.
More detailed info can be post this way if any of you need it.
Thanks & regards!
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-25-2005 02:56 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-25-2005 03:11 AM
08-25-2005 03:11 AM
Re: Storage issues
1) Having all the I/O go through 1 controller (usually X) and controller Y is there only for failover.
2) Using too much space as LUN's so that the AutoRAID is almost purely RAID5.
The fixes are:
For every VG, create 2 equally sized LUN's. LUN A should use Controller X as primary path (alternate y) and LUN B should use Controller Y as primary path (alternate X).
Stripe each LVOL in the VG across both LUN's
usually in 64KB chunks. There is no performance gain from increasing the number of LUN's per VG to above 2 although host-based performance monitoring tools will make it appear that you have an i/o bottleneck.
Allocate no more than about 50% of the total array space as LUN's. This will leave the array in RAID 1/0 at all times.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-25-2005 03:13 AM
08-25-2005 03:13 AM
Re: Storage issues
let's start posting the sar.report file after launched these two commands:
sar -o sarfile 3 30
sar -Af sarfile > sar.report
Then post the output of
swapinfo -tam
vmstat 5 10
Rgds,
Alex
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-25-2005 03:20 AM
08-25-2005 03:20 AM
Re: Storage issues
Did you connect the arrays using 4 SCSI controllers in your server? Did you configure their ID properly? A. Clay Stephensons reply gives you the best instruction to setup for optimal performance.
Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.
__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!
If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-25-2005 05:46 AM
08-25-2005 05:46 AM
Re: Storage issues
May be i wasn't say right way, this is what i did:
* One server with one 12H (12H0), shutdown the server, connect another 12H (12H1), startup the server, ioscan -fnC disk and the server "see" all disks, pvcreate to all 12H1 disks, and then when i try to setup a VG i can't add the alternate path to 12H1 disks, server go to slowly after this i can use all disks.
* When i try to resore any thing to these disks who belongs to a vg that resides on a 12H1 disks, server comes very veery slow.
Any way all requested info is in attached file,
Thanks & regards
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-25-2005 07:27 PM
08-25-2005 07:27 PM
Re: Storage issues
the only not-normal thing I see in your reports is a low average %wcache in you sar.report file: in a time you can,you should increase the buffer cache ( increase the BUFPAGES parameter and I think is necessary the regeneration of the kernel ).
Anyway, maybe it's more effective an analysis ( launch commands above )during the restore of disks in the 2H1. I think anyway that there is a problems with the communication between the two 12H.
Wait for the hints of some more experienced forumer about it.
Rgds,
Alex
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-26-2005 06:03 AM
08-26-2005 06:03 AM
Re: Storage issues
Or do you actually have 4 SCSI controllers in the server?
If you daisy chain the Arrays, you must change the controller IDs on the second Array (they default to 0 and 1).
hth
bv
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-03-2008 05:16 PM
04-03-2008 05:16 PM